S Sardo_Numspa Feb 2, 2004 #31 Quote from James Stock: I'm not so sure we'll be re-testing 1150 this week. More... I wouldn't be so sure to be not sure that we'll not be testing 1150 this week.
Quote from James Stock: I'm not so sure we'll be re-testing 1150 this week. More... I wouldn't be so sure to be not sure that we'll not be testing 1150 this week.
J James Stock Feb 3, 2004 #32 Quote from Sardo_Numspa: I wouldn't be so sure to be not sure that we'll not be testing 1150 this week. More... The above poll helps me believe that we will not re-test.
Quote from Sardo_Numspa: I wouldn't be so sure to be not sure that we'll not be testing 1150 this week. More... The above poll helps me believe that we will not re-test.
S Sardo_Numspa Feb 3, 2004 #33 Quote from James Stock: The above poll helps me believe that we will not re-test. More... Yeah, going by what the collective brains of ET say is the way to trade. Right.
Quote from James Stock: The above poll helps me believe that we will not re-test. More... Yeah, going by what the collective brains of ET say is the way to trade. Right.
J James Stock Feb 3, 2004 #34 Quote from Sardo_Numspa: Yeah, going by what the collective brains of ET say is the way to trade. Right. More... care to amend your collective brain? Read what I wrote and what you wrote again.
Quote from Sardo_Numspa: Yeah, going by what the collective brains of ET say is the way to trade. Right. More... care to amend your collective brain? Read what I wrote and what you wrote again.
M Mr Subliminal Feb 3, 2004 #35 Quote from Sardo_Numspa: I wouldn't be so sure to be not sure that we'll not be testing 1150 this week. More... Your cumbersome sentence reduces to the logical equivalent of supporting James' position.
Quote from Sardo_Numspa: I wouldn't be so sure to be not sure that we'll not be testing 1150 this week. More... Your cumbersome sentence reduces to the logical equivalent of supporting James' position.
C CalTrader Guest Feb 3, 2004 #36 Quote from Mr Subliminal: Your cumbersome sentence reduces to the logical equivalent of supporting James' position. More... LOL. Tomorrow should be an interesting day - as will the rest of the session to the close.
Quote from Mr Subliminal: Your cumbersome sentence reduces to the logical equivalent of supporting James' position. More... LOL. Tomorrow should be an interesting day - as will the rest of the session to the close.
W waggie945 Feb 3, 2004 #37 I'm gonna sell the February 1150 Calls "naked" on the SPX because someone on ET told me that you can do this and make a nice "credit for a finite amount of risk".
I'm gonna sell the February 1150 Calls "naked" on the SPX because someone on ET told me that you can do this and make a nice "credit for a finite amount of risk".
iceman1 Feb 3, 2004 #38 Quote from Sardo_Numspa: I wouldn't be so sure to be not sure that we'll not be testing 1150 this week. More... based upon what reason? And what does "I wouldn't be so sure...", mean. Is that like a random guess? It is a full moon week... so anything IS possible in this volatile market. But I just wondered if you have a reason for your thought. I tend to believe we do not rally until next week ("tend to believe") Regards, ICe
Quote from Sardo_Numspa: I wouldn't be so sure to be not sure that we'll not be testing 1150 this week. More... based upon what reason? And what does "I wouldn't be so sure...", mean. Is that like a random guess? It is a full moon week... so anything IS possible in this volatile market. But I just wondered if you have a reason for your thought. I tend to believe we do not rally until next week ("tend to believe") Regards, ICe
P pspr Feb 3, 2004 #40 Oh, man. Don't say "Bet on it." in a James Stock thread! Quote from spreadem: Wednesday or Thursday we'll be back up to 1150. Bet on it. More...
Oh, man. Don't say "Bet on it." in a James Stock thread! Quote from spreadem: Wednesday or Thursday we'll be back up to 1150. Bet on it. More...