funny article. did the author consider the following issues or he just picked 100th day like there is some freaking magic behind it:
1. the bull run we have had so far
2. Fed slowly removing the punch bowl, ECB about to do the same.
3. markets already pricing in everything positive there is to be priced in the next x years
4. consumer debt again at very very high levels, including sub prime auto loans (yet unemployment rate is so freaking low that would make you think everyone has got the money)
5. China debt bubble about to pop (funny how most brush over it like it's no big deal "china can handle it", didn't they same exact same thing in '06-07 about US...)
6. funny valuations including tesla, snapchats, whatever
7. any news is either a good or great news, whether its ballistic missile being tested, south chine sea issues, trump's stupidity, low or high payroll numbers, I mean everything
8. etc
I'm not saying the market can't go higher, it can go where ever it wants to (though I do wonder who's buying, is it algos?) but if someone is doing an analysis that cover multi year or decade period, IMO they should consider more than stupid 100th day performance to make predictions.
yeah breakout from consolidation (in ES but look at NQ running like there is no tomorrow), but don't they say that most breakouts fail? I guess there are too many shorts getting squeezed now on stops...

