Quote from thetrendfollowe:
Hi,
Does anybody here use "Short" ETFs for hedging a long term portfolio?
For example, you buy $10k worth of BGZ for every 100k in your longterm trend following portfolio, and you are still effectively maintaining a bullish bias of about 77%.
And you wouldn't have to pay interest on the leveraged short because its effectively like buying and holding a single stock.
Has anybody considered this?
Any thoughts on such a strategy? Any obvious flaws?
Thanks.
Nizar.
Ok lets give an example.
A 100k portfolio starts right at the market top.
Investor A.
100k longterm trend following.
Investor B.
90k longterm trend following, 10k on BGZ.
The longterm trend following component goes into a 40% drawdown as the market crashes. Lets say the market crashed 50%
Investor A is down to $60k.
Investor B; LTTF component is down to $54k (90k less 40%) BUT his ETF is suddenly worth $25k (up 150%).
Total portfolio value stands at:
Investor A has $60k
Investor B has $54k + 25k = $79k.
So at this stage max.DD for Investor B is actually 21% as opposed to 40%.
Let's see what happens in the recovery.
Let's say that during this initial recovery period the LTTF system is up 30% and the market recovered by 50%.
Investor A: $60K + 30% = $78k.
Investor B: $54k + 30% = $70k.
Thats just his LTTF component.
His BGZ gets ABSOLUTELY punished and is now worth only $4k (from $25k) down 83.33%.
So the conclusion;
Investor A: $78k.
Investor B: $74k.
So while the hedge does (obviously) limits the upside, it does so disproportionately to the limited risk.
Seems a goer.
The next question is, when, or how often, do you rebalance the portfolio to reflect the 90/10 split?