Interesting comment I read elsewhere.
Ackadamius | Mar 12, 2010 12:26 PM ET
Auditors can only report on the numbers that they are given by the corporation. Nor can they force a company to use those numbers in their statements. So basically the corporation can use whatever numbers they wish, the auditor is there just to sign off that they are abiding by GAAP and other standards.
Also, the timing differences are odd to me. The last audit was for the year ending in 2007 and these Repo 105's were used primarily in Q1 and Q2 of 2008, which is a period that was not audited. So that's a little suspect to me.
Plus if these Repo 105's were so bad why didn't anyone care until now? They've been used since 2001 by many firms and the IRS and SEC has approved them.
In my Investment Banking class during my MBA we were actually taught to use these because they help your balance sheet. It's perfectly legal and can drastically help your stock price. These exec's were just doing what they and every other MBA grad is taught to do.
To me this is a story 18 months late about things we already knew.