The Reason Renewables Can't Power Modern Civilization Is Because They Were Never Meant To

And your point? That thousands of the most intelligent scientists on earth are all retarded and gullible and that there is actually no issue with our environment and we should all read Piezoe's 5 line rebuttal to get schooled on HIS "facts"? Are some environmentalist diehards overstating facts? They certainly are. But climate change deniers are the much more ignorant breed for sure.

In the interest of bringing the level of the above post up to nearly that of chit chat, it's necessary to point out that CO2 is not 2%; its 50 times less than that, at 0.04%, according to recent measurements. It varies widely from one place to another near the Earth's surface. The 0.04% figure is thus a mean value, or should be, unless one of the climate alarmists, like that screwball Hansen, cheated by reporting only the figure measured next to an active volcano . Also it won't hurt to mention that CO2 is not "25 meters thick," as though it was the icing on a giant, round birthday cake; rather it is distributed in roughly the same mean percentage (better expressed as 405 ppm) throughout the atmosphere. The gases in the atmosphere comprise a gas solution, i.e., they remain mixed, in the same proportions despite their differences in molecular weight, due to thermal, or kT, energy. The relative proportions of atmospheric gases are the same more or less throughout the atmosphere. Is the atmosphere only "5000 meters thick"? If you say so, however there is still "atmosphere" well above 16,250 feet.
 
The Chinese and Asians are overtaking the Westerners because many Westerners are becoming 'Baizuo'.




baizuo1.png




baizuo2.png
 
I don't subscribe to the person depicted in this term. So, to get this straight, the Chinese are taking the moral high ground now? The same people who just got out of the communist prison 20 years ago suddenly know how to live life right? Funny to say the least. The same bitchy new generation Chinese who bow to everything baba Xi tells them to do and blows his dick whenever he wishes.

Identitity politics is only pushed by intellectually challenged people.

The Chinese and Asians are overtaking the Westerners because many Westerners are becoming 'Baizuo'.




baizuo1.png




baizuo2.png
 
Last edited:
The Chinese and Asians are overtaking the Westerners because many Westerners are becoming 'Baizuo'.




baizuo1.png




baizuo2.png

accurate description... however the real purpose is always the votes. The left has really no agenda to stand on, so they push policies to gain votes from the illegals, felons, LGBTs, trying to lower voting ages etc.
 
And your point? That thousands of the most intelligent scientists on earth are all retarded and gullible and that there is actually no issue with our environment and we should all read Piezoe's 5 line rebuttal to get schooled on HIS "facts"? Are some environmentalist diehards overstating facts? They certainly are. But climate change deniers are the much more ignorant breed for sure.
My view re "climate change" is virtually the same as Nir Shaviv's. It has nothing to do with attempting to characterize "thousands of the most intelligent scientists on earth ." I have repeatedly pointed out that scientific questions cannot be answered via opinion polls...
 
Last edited:
Should I be surprised? Climate change denier who rather builds his entire "house" on a "solar and cosmic-ray hypothesis". Of course, you characterize thousands of accomplished, respected, and peer-reviewed climate scientists who clearly outline a relationship between man-made CO2 emissions and climate change. Its as if you say "Hitler did not kill any Jews, but I do not characterize an entire generation of surviving Jews as liars"


My view re "climate change" is virtually the same as Nir Shaviv's. Nothing to do whatsoever with attempting to characterize "thousands of the most intelligent scientists on earth ."
 
Should I be surprised? Climate change denier who rather builds his entire "house" on a "solar and cosmic-ray hypothesis". Of course, you characterize thousands of accomplished, respected, and peer-reviewed climate scientists who clearly outline a relationship between man-made CO2 emissions and climate change. Its as if you say "Hitler did not kill any Jews, but I do not characterize an entire generation of surviving Jews as liars"
?
 
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/...iberate-fraud-to-increase-governmental-power/

you so naive bro...

all the straight facts I listed went completely over your head.. and you are now citing NASA, that is in a funding crisis and looking for a reason for its existence.... think for a second... the human CO2, is 2% of all the CO2, and is 2 inches thick... humans contribute close to nothing to any warming.

have you noticed, they are not even calling it 'global warming' no more, because the warming stopped lol... now they are using 'global climate change'.... if this does not sound a bullshit alarm for you, I'd guess trading the market can be difficult lol... because trading is all about unfolding bullshit stories lol.

'large percentage of scientists'.... that sounds like Al Gore speak.. I actually have a PhD in Physical Chemistry... you need to do some independent fact finding... go talk to some real scientists and ask this question - is it possible to get research grant, to CONFIRM the CO2 effect on global warming; is it possible to get research grant, to DISAPPROVE the CO2 effect... what do you think the scientists purpose of existence? to do research for the goodness of mankind? or to get enough grant to survive for the next 3 years?

currently in the science community, it's about 50/50 split between the 'alarmist camp' and the 'doubter camp'... find out how many of the former are funded, and how many of the latter are funded... the findings will be jaw dropping.... another moment of disappointment for mankind, that 'scientists', those people we idolize when we were little kids, can be bot off in such massive scale, can all sell their soul to the dark side, just so that they can have enough money to buy bread for the next 3 years.

you are a trader right.... follow the money trail.... EVERYTHING will make sense.

I'm confused (admittedly not familiar with atmosphere norms etc), if human co2 is only 2% and 2 inches thick, the whole co2 is only 100 inches thick? Also is 2% too small and not significant enough to alter the delicate balance that adds up year after year? I'm genuinely curious.
 
Hard to get any honest answers from climate change deniers. Better to independently educate yourself. the 2% or 2 inches is total BS and was read by the poster on some funny website. If 2% or 2 inches were mentioned anywhere then he took it completely out of context just so that 5000 meters or feet sound exorbitantly large in comparison to 2 inches.

I'm confused (admittedly not familiar with atmosphere norms etc), if human co2 is only 2% and 2 inches thick, the whole co2 is only 100 inches thick? Also is 2% too small and not significant enough to alter the delicate balance that adds up year after year? I'm genuinely curious.
 
Back
Top