%%No I don't. But as a mom and pop small trader, this is my understanding:
2. Unlike gambling, the edge and odds are moving targets and so the Kelly fraction is also a moving target.
3. In gaming, one can achieve terminal value with a large enough number of bets quickly. No so in investing/trading where your number of trades are usually not large enough to achieve statistical terminal value, or provide the correct Kelly fraction computation.
5...... most traders use 1/4 Kelly or less to further avoid the risk of ruin.
A further comment on Buffett and Soros: Their bets tended to be one off, so, as in the Bank of England bet, if the edge/odds are considered overwhelming (approaching 1) then an all in bet is not unreasonable.
Don't know if I make any sense.
Good points/sense. Trading is also unlike gambling/gaming also; in that some so called gambling winners get executed by the house/fellow players.
NOT all gamblers get shot in a casino concert, by a gambler, as over 555 did recently- i never got shot gambling- playing pool-gambling. Dont think Buffet ever did an all in position-maybe you know something i did not?? Carl Ichan did , for decades,well. + sold his casino, but dont know why he sold it; he sold CHK also@ a loss

