Why do you presume God would have no sense of humor? You're here.
Are you explicitly implying that - or implying that explicitly?!!
The Real Reason Romney Lost
- Thread starter AAAintheBeltway
- Start date
Why do you presume God would have no sense of humor? You're here.
Are you explicitly implying that - or implying that explicitly?!!
There ya go, isn't that how you do it.
So you have got it really. "Explicit statements are not implying anything other than what they state."Quote from MarketMasher:
Are you explicitly implying that - or implying that explicitly?!!
One understands the word of God explicitly , just as soon as you've implied from it whatever you want.
This is about atheism being a derivative religion isn't it Stu....
About how atheism requires theistic beliefs to negate, and therefore is derivative of theism......
Don't be upset about clinging to beliefs of a second-hand religion....
It's ok. Really.
uh-oh thread about to be ruined by stuage (pronounced as sewage) .
Actually Stu is a good example of why Romney lost and Obama won. We have a considerable amount of people in the country that are more concerned whether or not a Christmas tree should be called a holiday tree than they are about the economy, foreign policy, and a government that routinely misleads, misrepresents and has a great aversion to telling the truth about anything.
The REAL reason Romney is because blacks and Hispanics voted for "color". Look for more of this in future elections.
Quote from Scataphagos:
The REAL reason Romney is because blacks and Hispanics voted for "color". Look for more of this in future elections.
That is the scary message of the Coulter column, that and the fact that a lot of ignorant voters so resent the "rich" that they are prepared to hurt themselves and the country over it. And of course the fact that a scary number of people vote for president on matters such as they think republicans are against contraception.
It is not encouraging when you look around the world or even our own country. Places run by the sort of phony populists they elect are usually disasters, California and Mexico being two obvious examples.
No it isn't. This is about why certain people in a thread about the Real Reason Romney Lost, are more concerned with putting up silly pious irrational religious comments than tackle the way in which a candidate, who should have had a good run at a real challenge, did little else but flip flop all over everything, while at the same time produce no real manifesto in regard to the economy or foreign policy, and how ridiculous ideas based on nonsensical bible verses, routinely mislead, misrepresent and clearly encourage those who puke up and defend such nonsense, to have great aversions toward telling the truth about anything, and why the majority of Americans wouldn't accept it.Quote from MarketMasher:
This is about atheism being a derivative religion isn't it Stu....
About how atheism requires theistic beliefs to negate, and therefore is derivative of theism......
Don't be upset about clinging to beliefs of a second-hand religion....
It's ok. Really.