Yeah I put the shill on ignore a few months back, then took him off this week. I figured he would leave once the DNC stopped paying him, but I was wrong. He's still posting his flawed poll's.
The real reason Democrats lost? They didn't vote. And here comes some actual math to back it up
- Thread starter gwb-trading
- Start date
Yeah I put the shill on ignore a few months back, then took him off this week. I figured he would leave once the DNC stopped paying him, but I was wrong. He's still posting his flawed poll's.
So where do you come down? That it was just a matter of having a flawed candidate? Or do you think it was the shock of obamacare? I appreciate that the FBI stuff at the last minute was a gut shot and the Wikileaks was a disaster, but she brought most of it on herself. What could you guys have done differently and won?
Its a combination of everything you stated.We had a very flawed candidate for the reasons you mentioned and more and Obamacare prices came out before the election.I think we would have had a better shot with Sanders but I'm still not sure the country is ready to go that far left yet.We should have a better field in 2020 since The Clinton machine wont be there to scare anybody off from running.
Flawed candidate. Delusional policy. Come to the center. Bernie won because he promised to end off shoring. Globalism is done. If you come out with another globalist, we rip you another asshole.
Trump won...you're still depressed, still can't get pussy, still abusing alcohol..Still can't make any green trading...thank you Jesus!
speak for yourself, R2D2.
This is a War on Globalism. Perhaps you're just a useful idiot. Probably....
There are apparently 7 million more votes consisting of absentee and provisional ballots that are yet to be counted.
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics...-popular-vote-lead-will-grow-and-grow/507455/
They're almost all from California, New York and Washington, who have different rules for these kinds of ballots, so they're not making a case for a different winner in the election. Just that the popular vote totals will be significantly higher when the counting is done.
Trump may surpass Romney and Clinton may get close to what Obama got in '12.
This article also says democrat votes got flipped in the midwest, adding to the suggestion that they feel it is wrong to claim that democrats didn't come out to vote.
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics...-popular-vote-lead-will-grow-and-grow/507455/
They're almost all from California, New York and Washington, who have different rules for these kinds of ballots, so they're not making a case for a different winner in the election. Just that the popular vote totals will be significantly higher when the counting is done.
Trump may surpass Romney and Clinton may get close to what Obama got in '12.
This article also says democrat votes got flipped in the midwest, adding to the suggestion that they feel it is wrong to claim that democrats didn't come out to vote.
Clintons accuse their adversaries what they are guilty of.....
End of the day she only carried the deepest blue states, plus Virginia and Nevada. Bernie would probably have done at least that well. Scary thought. Hillary had baggage but was semi-credible as president.
I agree with you that the removal of the Clinton machine opens things up. The problem is the base wants red meat and most of the country is vegetarian.