The real reason Democrats lost? They didn't vote. And here comes some actual math to back it up

[gwb-trading]

The real reason Democrats lost? They didn't vote. And here comes some actual math to back it up...

Democrats Lost Because Democrats Didn't Vote
http://www.electoral-vote.com/evp2016/Pres/Maps/Nov11.html

 

[smallStops]

This was analysed on "Election Autopsy" here.
Also "Tony" reported his face to face discussions with Democrats who decided to stay home:
the obamacare was the main culprit.

https://www.elitetrader.com/et/threads/the-election-autopsy.304217

 

[Buy1Sell2]

This was analysed on "Election Autopsy" here.
Also "Tony" reported his face to face discussions with Democrats who decided to stay home:
the obamacare was the main culprit.

https://www.elitetrader.com/et/threads/the-election-autopsy.304217

I look for the Stark postings to gradually reduce to an extremely low level and perhaps disappear totally.

 

[fhl]

Ginsburg is ticked now because she can't retire for another four years since Clinton doesn't get to replace her.

 

[Scataphagos]

Ginsburg is ticked now because she can't retire for another four years since Clinton doesn't get to replace her.

The Supreme Court should NEVER BE ABOUT POLITICS.... It was intended to defend the US Constitution and America against power-hungry presidents and Congress. PERIOD!

 

[AAAintheBeltway]

That article is nonsense. They completely overlook the phenomenon of democrats voting for Trump. I don't want to waste my time proving it, but my thesis is that Trump's totals were hurt by NeverTrumpers, ie country club republicans who considered Trump too vulgar to vote for, but their relatively meager numbers were overshadowed by Reagan democrats.

 

[java]

Rustycrats

 

[gwb-trading]

That article is nonsense. They completely overlook the phenomenon of democrats voting for Trump. I don't want to waste my time proving it, but my thesis is that Trump's totals were hurt by NeverTrumpers, ie country club republicans who considered Trump too vulgar to vote for, but their relatively meager numbers were overshadowed by Reagan democrats.

I would state based on exit polling the number of registered Democrats who crossed over and voted for Trump is meaningless next to the 9 million Democrats who failed to show up and vote in the election when compared to 2008.

 

[Vertex]

They (the elites in the democrat party) were told over and over for more than a year that Hillary was a lying, untrustworthy bitch that did not inspire voters. And it wasn't just the evil racist white working people telling them this.

Now, it is the voters fault for not doing as they were told.

Hopefully, they wont figure it out next time either.

 

[Wallet]

That article is nonsense. They completely overlook the phenomenon of democrats voting for Trump. I don't want to waste my time proving it, but my thesis is that Trump's totals were hurt by NeverTrumpers, ie country club republicans who considered Trump too vulgar to vote for, but their relatively meager numbers were overshadowed by Reagan democrats.

Exactly. If anything they should write about the republicans who didn't show up at the polls, if the GOP would have embraced Trump it would have been a land slide. Yes,there was a section of Dem's that boycotted, but the election was won by the "Rustycrats" (saw that and liked it) blue collar, conservative Democrats who flipped and came out in droves for Trump.