They're the same person, or at least a few of them are.
He's also on target w/r/t Freud, though the unnecessisary verbosity doesn't help much.
He's also on target w/r/t Freud, though the unnecessisary verbosity doesn't help much.
Quote from John Merchant:
In accordance with the alluringly alliterative analogies offered here, let me add a personal example from my own trading. If I understand Freud, we forget because we have no wish to be reminded of something unpleasant which the forgotten thing reminds us of. I have experienced this myself. I have rigid trading rules which continually evolve so that over time new rules completely supplant old ones. But rules remind me that at core I am impetuously and impecuniously impulsive. Of which I do not wish to be reminded. So I often conveniently "forget" a rule which paradoxically allows me to trade an old rule impulsively. Does that make any sense, Dr. Mudgins?
Mon excellent Francois-Marie,Quote from F.-M. Arouet:
You will recall that Freud's first chapter was entitled (in translation) "Forgetting of Proper Names." I offer that there is a great on-line psychological divide between using one's "proper" name, as does the the estimable Mr. Bright, and the run-of-the-mill poster who unconsciously selects a psychologically damning alias for himself. (I shall refrain from offering up obvious and disturbing examples so as not to inflame the already incendiary populace here.) I submit that it is easier to "forget oneself" when one has become dissociated by the frequent and persistent use of an alias or aliases. How can such a personality hope to be so integral as to trade well?
Yah must be off your rocker!Quote from Buy1Sell2:
This thread has now been closed due to multiple personality disorder