Quote from NYSEscalpa:
every thread that even hints of a trader having issues turns into the same 'ol tired "check the balance sheets" advertisement for Bright..well, you've got the balance sheets, so what? I'd rather go with an LLC where I don't put up much capital and get rates that are much better than BTs. For a high volume trader, the amount of money saved on rates of let's say .003 vs. Brights of .006 (is that where the break is these days? I know they start at .01, ouch!) are substantial. Think about if you trade 3 million shares a month. You are paying a premium of 108,000/yr for your precious balance sheets. Hell, you're better off with a true daytrading firm that is a little less well capitalized (I can name several) that doesn't charge an arm and a leg to trade there.....let's say worst case scenario, you lose your $25K deposit, well, that's a calculated risk I'd be willing to take to add an extra 6 figures to my yearly income. of course, I'm not saying just deposit your money in some random LLC, do your own due diligence...
I believe this is your post: 10-02-06 07:32 PM
ummm, anyone ever thought about contacting the SEC?? this seems like a case of outright fraud...a ponzi scheme- where redemption requests are funded by new trader deposits....
It appears that we agree more than we disagree.
When our top traders have come over from other "low cost" firms, it's because they need to use capital to make a living. And, BTW, high volume traders are not paying any more here than anywhere else where they can use significant capital.
I don't mind having "apples and apples" comparisons, and I understand that we may not be the best "fit" for everyone. The main firms all get along pretty well, no "Sunni/Shiite" tribal war going on....I prefer to keep everything friendly and up front, that's all.
Have a good day,
Don
