The problem with crossover systems

The "problem" with crossover systems is they don't do what you want. That is, they don't "confirm a new trend so that it's safe to enter the water" on a trade. And they don't reduce or eliminate whipsaws.


That's kind of correct, but also a bit unfair on this useful pattern. No crossovers indicate a trend is about to start. But how could they?

But they are pretty good at confirming a trend might have started some time ago. Price isn't necessarily in a trend - rising prices don't automatically mean there is an uptrend. All trends have a MA crossover but not all crossovers indicate a trend has started. And none f them indicate a trend is going to start tomorrow.
 
That's kind of correct, but also a bit unfair on this useful pattern. No crossovers indicate a trend is about to start. But how could they?

But they are pretty good at confirming a trend might have started some time ago. Price isn't necessarily in a trend - rising prices don't automatically mean there is an uptrend. All trends have a MA crossover but not all crossovers indicate a trend has started. And none f them indicate a trend is going to start tomorrow.

In the K.I.S.S. frame of trading..

1. Crossovers dont' do what you want.

2. Even when crossovers appear to be "good", they're lagging with price. If you're a sharp trader, you should have seen the trade before the cross.

3. Some crossover params may actually accerate your losses. Trading on a daily average crossover is weak. Trading the MACD is weaker still.

If you cared about my view... I'd say, "forget the notion of daily price, moving average crossovers". There is better to be traded. (Interestingly, my first exposure to TA was the "20 day MA crossover".)
 
Last edited:
In the K.I.S.S. frame of trading..

1. Crossovers dont' do what you want.

2. Even when crossovers appear to be "good", they're coincident with price. If you're a sharp trader, you should have seen the trade before the cross.

3. Some crossover params may actually accerate your losses. Trading on a daily average crossover is weak. Trading the MACD is weaker still.

If you cared about my view... I'd say, "forget the notion of daily price, moving average crossovers". There is better to be traded. (Interestingly, my first exposure to TA was the "20 day MA crossover".)


1. Crossovers do what they do. Traders run into fatal losses when they try to make them do something they can't. Plus two other scenarios - one, if traders blindly enter on a cross: without some filter this is random trading; the other, is if traders buy on a cross and hold until there is an opposite cross.

2. Yes, there is always a trade before the crossover. The crossover confirms a trend might have already developed: if you only want to trade maturing trends, that is not a problem.

3. It works, its always worked, it will always work. It isn't perfect but the very poor reputation is down to very poor use, not very poor characteristics.
 
1. Crossovers do what they do. Traders run into fatal losses when they try to make them do something they can't. Plus two other scenarios - one, if traders blindly enter on a cross: without some filter this is random trading; the other, is if traders buy on a cross and hold until there is an opposite cross.

2. Yes, there is always a trade before the crossover. The crossover confirms a trend might have already developed: if you only want to trade maturing trends, that is not a problem.

3. It works, its always worked, it will always work. It isn't perfect but the very poor reputation is down to very poor use, not very poor characteristics.

Congrats. You've successfully argued against your own case. Good for you.
 
Trend line / regression line is ‘quicker’ combined with historical intraday timepoints where orderflow is known to cause the largest historical price variance.
 
Thanks. Yeah I got duped by Xela, but live and learn. I might point out a few things, I never meet Xela in person, when I said I was there for her treatments, it was through "ET" and not physically there, just as I was going through my treatments, "Xela"(he or she) would exchange PM's. Last time been to London twice in 2010 for health reasons. For those who made fun of my handicaps, I was born with Klinefelters, can't have children though some actually can by storing small amounts of sperm, I have zippo, I grew up in very strict old Russia/Europe ways so when I speak using terms that are not like terms used today-like "fathered" and women I have had relationships and they had children-I "fathered" meaning I was father figure in their lives. I have never said I was biological father. I have a host of problems between Klinefelters which opened the doors of Sarcoidosis I been having past 10.5 years, past January confirmed Aspergers, and relatives confirmed they always thought I was autistic growing up but parents thought I was just slow in being social and inability of proper speech.

I exchanged many PM's with Xela, looking back I could have challenged "her" dozen times for areas that I now see as not seeming right at the time, but "she" was a intelligent friend during times most would not know how to respond or having their own health concerns. I am not angry at her at all, nor myself, "whoever" gave me time and often at times when I really needed it.

Most of you will never understand someone like me, most have families to some degree, I severed long ago or those close have past on to next world.

I apologize for my initial outburst, have one less friend who never ask me about trading.

Welcome back Handle123. I enjoy all your posts and comments.

What happen to Xela?
 
Back
Top