Brooks and Volman are okay. Murphy, Pring and Schwager are not okay.
Even with Brooks and Volman, they try too hard to make PA sound more complicated than it actually is, as if it were some voodoo magic that only the initiates can understand.
PA is and should be very simple IMO. It boils down to pattern recognition. All you need are lines: horizontal and diagonal. Other than that, you need only look at a few sample of patterns like 3 bar reversal (higher high/lower low), hammer or inverted hammer, etc.
Lastly, somewhat off topic, but you really need to understand these two important trading concepts. Without it, even PA is useless.
- You don't need to beat the market. You just need to stay ahead of the guy who is dumber than you. This might sound trite on the surface, but take your time and let that sink in for a moment.
- Market doesn't care whether you make money or not on a daily basis. But it will make damn sure that you go broke in the end. How will they do this? They do this by setting up TRAPS. Learn to recognize these traps.
Schizo, thanks for sharing your views on this.
Do you remember all those threads we had here several years ago that had titles containing the phrase "If you can draw a straight line"? (some are pasted below; not sure if it's all of them).
I remember that some past PA traders and frequent posters like Redneck and NoDoji participated in the discussions, which suggests there was some meat there, but I haven't really taken the time to read through them. Are you familiar with them and if so do you think there are similarities to the support and resistance lines that you are recommending... is there value there for learning PA...

PA isn’t a setup 