Quote from kcgoogler:
hey gmst,
i am going to put out an idea to see if someone can come up with anything better. I am doing something similar to you. I have been trading ES for just about 2years now using a handful of intraday strategies. And been profitable.. so i tried to expand; first i looked at other liquid futures markets - other than bonds and maybe euro most of the other futures markets are a little less liquid for my taste (see my edge intraday is good to give me good risk adjusted returns but not enough to trade most of these markets).. so i then looked at stocks. But always cost of carry and commisions have kept me out of equity markets.
Recently about maybe 9 months ago i found out about the prop model - where you get leverage and cheaper commisions than on the retail side. It works out well for me; i put up 30-40k and get to trade close to a million. Slowly i will grow but this is plenty for me for now.
So if your strategy is not hardwired to forex (which it should not), why not look into expanding into equity markets? and just use prop firm as a partner who gives you good intraday leverage and good commisions (specially if you add liquidity most of the time - i do about 90% of the time).
The way i see it, if i am with a firm that only takes my commisions and gives me leverage, its like a hedge fund where you keep 100% of profits.
-gariki
Quote from oldtime:
how many times do I have to tell you this? I can make 20% a year and I have the track record to prove it. So how much do I need to make a living full time? More than I have. So where do I go? To a prop firm. Yes I give up some of the profits, but I get a whole lot more buying power than the margin my retail broker will give me.
Quote from syswizard:
Why does a guy with this kind of track record need prop again ?
I don't "get it" ! And if that blotter came with huge volume, prop firms would be jumping at the opportunity to sign him up, no ?
Quote from Lucias:
It was hypothetical but beside the point.. most firms will only consider track records where the trader is trading 10's of millions of dollars. 500 million is not uncommon.. So you won't get reviewed without X asset under management.
you could do 1000x return.. nobody cares. this is opportunity.. the biggest traders aren't the best.
Quote from Lucias:
It was hypothetical but beside the point.. most firms will only consider track records where the trader is trading 10's of millions of dollars. 500 million is not uncommon.. So you won't get reviewed without X asset under management.
you could do 1000x return.. nobody cares. this is opportunity.. the biggest traders aren't the best.