The Orwellian Obama Presidency

Under Mr. Obama, friends are enemies, denial is wisdom, capitulation is victory.

The humiliating denouement to America’s involvement in Yemen came over the weekend, when U.S. Special Forces were forced to evacuate a base from which they had operated against the local branch of al Qaeda. This is the same branch that claimed responsibility for the January attack on Charlie Hebdo and has long been considered to pose the most direct threat to Europe and the United States.

So who should Barack Obama be declaring war on in the Middle East other than the state of Israel?

There is an upside-down quality to this president’s world view. His administration is now on better terms with Iran—whose Houthi proxies, with the slogan “God is great, death to America, death to Israel, damn the Jews, power to Islam,” just deposed Yemen’s legitimate president—than it is with Israel. He claims we are winning the war against Islamic State even as the group continues to extend its reach into Libya, Yemen and Nigeria.

He treats Republicans in the Senate as an enemy when it comes to the Iranian nuclear negotiations, while treating the Russian foreign ministry as a diplomatic partner. He favors the moral legitimacy of the United Nations Security Council to that of the U.S. Congress. He is facilitating Bashar Assad’s war on his own people by targeting ISIS so the Syrian dictator can train his fire on our ostensible allies in the Free Syrian Army.

He was prepared to embrace a Muslim Brother as president of Egypt but maintains an arm’s-length relationship with his popular pro-American successor. He has no problem keeping company with Al Sharpton and tagging an American police department as comprehensively racist but is nothing if not adamant that the words “Islamic” and “terrorism” must on no account ever be conjoined. The deeper that Russian forces advance into Ukraine, the more they violate cease-fires, the weaker the Kiev government becomes, the more insistent he is that his response to Russia is working.

To adapt George Orwell’s motto for Oceania: Under Mr. Obama, friends are enemies, denial is wisdom, capitulation is victory.

The current victim of Mr. Obama’s moral inversions is the recently re-elected Israeli prime minister. Normally a sweeping democratic mandate reflects legitimacy, but not for Mr. Obama. Now we are treated to the astonishing spectacle in which Benjamin Netanyahu has become persona non grata for his comments doubting the current feasibility of a two-state solution. This, while his Palestinian counterpart Mahmoud Abbas is in the 11th year of his four-year term, without a murmur of protest from the White House.

It is true that Mr. Netanyahu made an ugly election-day remark about Israeli-Arab voters “coming out in droves to the polls,” thereby putting “the right-wing government in danger.” For this he has apologized, in person, to leaders of the Israeli-Arab community.

That’s more than can be said for Mr. Abbas, who last year threatened Israel with a global religious war if Jews were allowed to pray in the Temple Mount’s Al Aqsa mosque. “We will not allow our holy places to be contaminated,” the Palestinian Authority president said. The Obama administration insists that Mr. Abbas is “the best interlocutor Israel is ever going to have.”

Maybe that’s true, but if so it only underscores the point Mr. Netanyahu was making in the first place—and for which Mr. Obama now threatens a fundamental reassessment of U.S. relations with Israel. In 2014 Mr. Abbas agreed to a power-sharing agreement with Hamas, a deal breaker for any Israeli interested in peace. In 2010 he used the expiration of a 10-month Israeli settlement freeze as an excuse to abandon bilateral peace efforts. In 2008 he walked away from a statehood offer from then-Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert. In 2000 he was with Yasser Arafat at Camp David when the Palestinians turned down a deal from Israel’s Ehud Barak.

And so on. For continuously rejecting good-faith Israeli offers, Mr. Abbas may be about to get his wish: a U.S. vote for Palestinian statehood at the United Nations. For tiring of constant Palestinian bad faith—and noting the fact—Israel will now be treated to pariah-nation status by Mr. Obama.

***
Here is my advice to the Israeli government, along with every other country being treated disdainfully by this crass administration: Repay contempt with contempt. Mr. Obama plays to classic bully type. He is abusive and surly only toward those he feels are either too weak, or too polite, to hit back.

The Saudis figured that out in 2013, after Mr. Obama failed to honor his promises on Syria; they turned down a seat on the Security Council, spoke openly about acquiring nuclear weapons from Pakistan and tanked the price of oil, mainly as a weapon against Iran. Now Mr. Obama is nothing if not solicitous of the Saudi highnesses.

The Israelis will need to chart their own path of resistance. On the Iranian nuclear deal, they may have to go rogue: Let’s hope their warnings have not been mere bluffs. Israel survived its first 19 years without meaningful U.S. patronage. For now, all it has to do is get through the next 22, admittedly long, months.

http://www.wsj.com/articles/bret-stephens-the-orwellian-obama-presidency-1427153308
 
644446_370212766495418_2338118575639182912_n.jpg
 
"...Israel survived its first 19 years without meaningful U.S. patronage. For now, all it has to do is get through the next 22, admittedly long, months.

http://www.wsj.com/articles/bret-stephens-the-orwellian-obama-presidency-1427153308

Odumbo is a closet Islamic Terrorist... hates America, hates Israel. Everything he says and does SCREAMS that to anyone with half-a-brain. Every time he has a choice about policy or law, he always chooses the one which harms America.

Let's hope more of us wake up and "get it" before it's too late.

:(
 
Odumbo is a closet Islamic Terrorist... hates America, hates Israel. Everything he says and does SCREAMS that to anyone with half-a-brain. Every time he has a choice about policy or law, he always chooses the one which harms America.

Let's hope more of us wake up and "get it" before it's too late.

:(
Thank goodness he hasn't been able to hurt the economy!
 
Yeah, you Nazi Commie Fascist! Forget about the banks and the Repub bailouts.
As I recall, he's in Denver, so financial help for he and his family is on the way.

Denver and the West
Rebounding economy, boosts tax revenues, triggers TABOR refunds
By John Frank
The Denver Post

Posted: 03/18/2015 06:31:46 PM MDT

"Colorado is preparing to issue rebates to taxpayers for the first time in nearly 15 years.

"The latest economic forecasts released Wednesday indicate the state will exceed its constitutional limit on tax collections by between $70 million and $220 million this fiscal year, triggering refunds under the Taxpayer's Bill of Rights.

"How much taxpayers will see when they file their 2015 taxes in April 2016 remains unclear, but the amount is expected to be modest.

"The refunds will range from $15 to $89 per taxpayer based on income level, with the lowest-income earners possibly receiving an additional $230 break.

"Thanks to the state's continued economic resurgence, the early projections show refunds should continue for the next three years, unless lawmakers request voter approval to spend the money or approve other tax breaks to offset the extra revenue.

"For months, economic forecasts suggested the prospect of refunds, but the March report serves as the definitive voice. The latest forecasts will determine the amount lawmakers can spend in the state budget and for other major legislation.

"The refunds may come as welcome news for taxpayers, but it makes it more difficult for Colorado lawmakers to meet spending needs in priority areas, such as education, transportation and health care. At the same time, the potential for TABOR refunds is likely to energize talks about whether to ask voters through a ballot initiative to allow the state to keep the money.

"When new revenue comes in because the state is doing better — regardless of whether or not some of us feel that could be used for services — we are obligated to give that back," said Rep. Lois Court, D-Denver. "So basically we are in a net."

Two forecasts

"The lawmakers received two forecasts, one from economists in the governor's office and another from economists in the General Assembly, and later will decide which to use as the baseline.

"In terms of economic growth, both reports suggest the state's tax revenue continues to grow at nearly 9 percent, giving lawmakers about $800 million more to spend.

"But much of the additional money this year is consumed by ongoing budget obligations, meaning it may prove difficult to pay for a felony DUI bill or press for more higher-education money.

"All we are going to be able to do is barely keep up," said Sen. Pat Steadman, a Denver Democrat and budget writer.

"This year, the fiscal picture is more difficult because of TABOR refunds.

"The constitutional provision mandates refunds when revenue exceeds the rate of inflation and population growth, unless voters approve a request to spend the money.

"The governor's Office of State Planning and Budgeting suggests the TABOR refunds could reach $220 million next year, while the Legislative Council estimate puts the total amount for refunds closer to $70 million.

"If the excess revenue exceeds $100 million, it triggers the state's earned income tax credit, which gives low-income working families an extra permanent tax break."


More >>
 
Yeah, you Nazi Commie Fascist! Forget about the banks and the Repub bailouts.

Republican bailout?

Try again.
More Dems voted for it than Republicans...

http://www.politifact.com/oregon/st...chrader-says-more-republicans-democrats-vote/

PolitiFact Oregon went straight to the voting records to check this claim.

As it turns out, the House actually had to vote twice for the particular bill in which TARP was included. The first vote was on Sept. 29, 2008. The legislation failed to move, though, with 205 representatives voting in favor and 228 against. Of those who voted for the the passage, 140 were Democrats and 65 were Republicans.

A few days later, with the economy worsening, the bill got a second life when Senate members took a completely unrelated piece of legislation that hadn’t much moved anywhere for months and stuffed it with the bailout language. The new bill passedthe Senate on Oct. 1, 2008. On that day, 39 Democrats, 34 Republicans and one Independent voted in favor of the legislation. So, Schrader is wrong there.

The House then voted on the TARP language -- for the second time -- two days after the Senate, on Oct. 3, 2008. Ninety-one Republicans joined 172 Democrats in voting for the bill. Again, Schrader is wrong on this vote.
 
Back
Top