Quote from 1a2b3cppp:
No it wouldn't, because this method would also work with non-fib percentages being used. Remember, I normally don't even use fibs. I'm only doing it for this thread because I want to have the only profitable, non-vague, non-BS fib method out there.
Fibs are used in this system, but they're an afterthought. The system is not based on them.
Quote from 1a2b3cppp:
Anyway, also keep in mind that this is really only half of the method. There's another hedging component. But I'm not even going to introduce that for a while cuz I'm not in the mood to deal with all the people who are like "ZOMG DOOD DON'T U KNOW THAT BEING LONG AND SHORT AT THE SAME TIEM IS THE SAME AS BEING FLAT LOLOLOL!"
Can you discuss the hedging aspect of the system? It seems that we've been missing half of your method.
Quote from jem:
have you explained how any system can beat random numbers in the long run.
We some big stats guy on here trying to explain the same thing.
He started talking about flocking. Which really was a cop out because flocking is organization on a smaller time frame. (in my opinion).
Quote from chefo:
Can you discuss the hedging aspect of the system? It seems that we've been missing half of your method.