Quote from taowave:
If I understand you correctly,you wait until a 61.8% retracement to buy your fitst lot,and add at the 50% and 38.2%%.If wrong,you liquidate at the the full retracement...And where do you sell at a profit?
I said "I exit at 100%." That's my target profit (most of the time).
If I am right how can you say you dont care and buy all of them??
Let me try to explain it again.
Fib gurus will post after the fact charts. In one of them, price retraces to 38% and they say "look! Price retraced to 38% and we bought there!!!" In another one, price retraced to 50% and they will say "look, price retraced to 50% and we bought there!"
My whole point is that ahead of time, they had NO IDEA where it was going to go. On the second chart, they didn't know that it was going to go past 38% down to 50%. And on the first chart, they had no idea it was going to reverse at 38% and not go down to 50%.
Do you know in advance that price will retrace 61.8% and then trade up to the 50% and 38% levels??
No. I don't know if it is going to reverse at 38%, or 50%, or 62%... or 27.5%, or 36.349287%, or 95.11111%, or anywhere else.
Sounds to me like you certainly care,otherwise you would average down starting at the 38% retracement down to the 68%.
I do average down starting at 38% down to 68%.
(did you mean to say "...otherwise you wouldn't average down..."?)
I would have to assume you are entering with an allocated size per level,and most likely if you are filled at all levels you are in at apx a 50% retracement...
Depending on the position sizing used, yeah, but it's usually a little bit below the 50% level.
You sound like a closet Fibber to me![]()
Well like I said, the method posted in this thread has been modified to use fib levels (as opposed to the levels I usually use which are completely unrelated to fibs or anything else like that). I am doing it this way because I wanted to be the first person ever to post a method that uses fibs that is not vague or ambiguous at all.