Quote from 1a2b3cppp:
>>>>"Because you're taking something that is definitely
outside the realm of financial markets and trying to apply it to the financial markets
>>>>>It's exactly as illogical as applying something like the progression of Tennis Scores, which are definitely
outside the realm of financial markets, (0 (love), 15, 30, 40) and trying to apply that to the financial markets.
>>>>Or taking [anything] that is
outside the realm of the financial markets and trying to apply it to the financial markets.<<<<
>>>But is completely
outside the realm of trading and that is why it makes as much sense to apply it to trading as it does to apply Tennis scores or prime numbers or anything else.
I'm not sure how else I can explain it.
>>>>>I mean think about it. You're saying that a ratio of numbers (that may or may not even be found in nature) are somehow appliacble to psychology. That's a collosal stretch.
>>>>>Ratio of things in nature != psychology. That's as absurd as saying the number of pellets in a bag of dog food can predict basketball scores.
>>>>>Now you're comparing entirely unrelated things.
>>>>>Pointing out one illogical behavior does not prove another.
>>>>>You're trying to say that "people buy homes they can't afford. That is illogical. Therefore, fibonaccis must also work because that is also illogical."
You'd fail Intro to Logic 101 with that argument.<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
>>>>> shhhhsh check out this video. the fibs are in your make up from your nose to your ass; even breathing which is being done thru lungs that follow the fibonaaci sequence.
now apply Logic 101 to this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=085KSyQVb-U&feature=PlayList&p=BDE4541E386B3A63&index=6