Quote from 1a2b3cppp:
by the way, this thread is a great example of forum psychology.
- Threads with vague "methods" go on for dozens of pages. Look at the JH bullshit, or ProfLogic's ergodic thread, or jjrvat's, or Anek's threads, etc. Or the (other) fib threads with all the after-the-fact charts posted. "OMG I HAVE TO STUDY THE MYSTICAL NATURE FIBONACCI SEASHELL SEQUENCE OF LIFE!!! SEASHELLS ARE DIRECTLY APPLICABLE TO TRADING!!!"
- This thread gave everything up front with no bullshit, no guru story, no nothing, and it got only a few replies. I'm sad! I really thought this would turn into a good discussion. Especially, since it didn't take 40 pages to get clarification from the guru threadstarter. Well, the only thing I left open for interpretation was how many lots to buy at each position. But that's gonna depend on you and also on how wide the gap is from the 0 line to the 100 line, because it's going to vary based on the size of the trend. Your position size for a span of 10 points might be different from on a span of 50 points because the total dollar risk would be different, then.
Note - I'm not responsible for any losses. But if price retraces at fib numbers, like people claim, this method should make a lot of money.