That's exactly what I am saying, how can the board certify results without knowing that margin? How can they be sure that there wasn't more fraud in the results without a proper investigation? This was organized by the Republican on a grand scale, it was not a one off fraud where the voter themselves made the decision knowingly or unknowingly.
As explained in my post - many previous elections in our state (and other states) have been certified with two results of ballot totals; one per the accounting and the other listing disputed ballots. This is common practice that has been done by the State Board of Elections (controlled by Democrats) for the past 50 years.