CherryPicker1, I have engaged in plenty of debates in the past here at ET. But not lately. Besides, obvious facts don't require much in the way of actual debate. You should try to understand that it makes about as much sense to debate you as it does to debate a fern. The principal difference is that a fern knows when to shut up and at least look smart.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
The Obama era
- Thread starter fhl
- Start date
Quote from Thunderdog:
CherryPicker1, I have engaged in plenty of debates in the past here at ET. But not lately. Besides, obvious facts don't require much in the way of actual debate. You should try to understand that it makes about as much sense to debate you as it does to debate a fern. The principal difference is that a fern knows when to shut up and at least look smart.
I can't think of a time in the last decade where the country had more things to debate, question and argue about.
Using excuses such as saying there is nothing to debate clearly shows your superficial thought process.
Quote from Thunderdog:
Maybe so, but certainly not anything that you and your brethren have raised here lately. (Think fern.)
Agreed Thunder.
I've always been amazed at how much effort has gone into discussing a "Pre-presidency".
Must be because the Country elected a BLACK man, cause nothing else makes much sense or carries any merit based on facts already in evidence.
I guess there are some people here on ET that believe that a BLACK man can sing, dance, and be an athlete or even a Secretary of State . . . But President???
:eek: