Calling out your hypocrisy is part of the equation
The Obama Chronicles Vol 3 - Obama insults Nancy Reagan with tasteless joke
- Thread starter wildchild
- Start date
The Evangelicals are full of abuse cases also just the fragmented nature of the many small churches in their "conventions" etc. makes it hard to see. Now I'm not butwhatabouting there, both are bad.
I did a little work back in the early 90s on software for constructing paedophile gang organisations from known associates of known guys. The intended use was by a human rights org looking at Saudi Arabia especially as a major hub of trafficking and ZERO accountability for pedo gangs there. Other countries also and not just Muslims. The religion has little to do with it, the pedos worm their way into organizations using their charming narcissist ways and then find ways to get solo access to kids. If they get caught and are high enough up, they say god said it was cool.
Though it is funny this occult talk. I heard my cousin say she figured Trump being a deal maker had made one at a crossroads just last week.
WildChild's quest for moral equivalency is breathtaking in it's hypocrisy and outright fundamental futility. Striving for trivial moral arguments to justify his position does appear to indicate that the behavior of the cult leader is disturbing to him on a subconscious level.
Haha WC is out of his depth.
Here little fella, I know that tinfoil hat you got is hot.
"Moral equivalence is a term used in political arguments or debate. It is an informal fallacy. ... The actions of A are morally equivalent to the actions of B, therefore A is just as good or bad as B, regardless of what the actual actions are."
Haha WC is out of his depth.
Here little fella, I know that tinfoil hat you got is hot.
"Moral equivalence is a term used in political arguments or debate. It is an informal fallacy. ... The actions of A are morally equivalent to the actions of B, therefore A is just as good or bad as B, regardless of what the actual actions are."
Lets review how this topic started.
"We hear how civil Obama was and how he was nice to everyone. This is one the biggest lies going. Obama was a mean, nasty, vicious punk. We remember that shortly after his election in 2008 were he insulted Nancy Reagan and disrespected the memory of one of America's greatest Presidents.
At a news conference in Chicago, Obama said he had spoken with all the living presidents as he prepares to take office in January. Then he smiled and said, "I didn't want to get into a Nancy Reagan thing about doing any seances."
What a mean-spirited thing to say to widow! Angry leftists everywhere cheered this low brow insult. Then the media has the balls to claim that this Obama fellow was civil. The media are liars, the democrats are liars, and Obama is a liar.
This is the same guy who called Sarah Palin a pig and made fun of children in Special Olympics. The guy is a spherical asshole."
That is how this thread started. I do not see one mention of Donald Trump. It clearly states Obama's bad behavior. Then Bugenhagen, Tony Stark, and TRS, started in with "Ohhh yeah, what about Trump". Which is what? A moral equivalence argument.
The clowns then turn around and say I am making a moral equivalence argument, which I never did. As Bugenhagen stated in his post
"Moral equivalence is a term used in political arguments or debate. It is an informal fallacy."
Wildchild wins again, GAME, SET, MATCH.
Lets review how this topic started.
"We hear how civil Obama was and how he was nice to everyone. This is one the biggest lies going. Obama was a mean, nasty, vicious punk. We remember that shortly after his election in 2008 were he insulted Nancy Reagan and disrespected the memory of one of America's greatest Presidents.
At a news conference in Chicago, Obama said he had spoken with all the living presidents as he prepares to take office in January. Then he smiled and said, "I didn't want to get into a Nancy Reagan thing about doing any seances."
What a mean-spirited thing to say to widow! Angry leftists everywhere cheered this low brow insult. Then the media has the balls to claim that this Obama fellow was civil. The media are liars, the democrats are liars, and Obama is a liar.
This is the same guy who called Sarah Palin a pig and made fun of children in Special Olympics. The guy is a spherical asshole."
That is how this thread started. I do not see one mention of Donald Trump. It clearly states Obama's bad behavior. Then Bugenhagen, Tony Stark, and TRS, started in with "Ohhh yeah, what about Trump". Which is what? A moral equivalence argument.
The clowns then turn around and say I am making a moral equivalence argument, which I never did. As Bugenhagen stated in his post
"Moral equivalence is a term used in political arguments or debate. It is an informal fallacy."
Wildchild wins again, GAME, SET, MATCH.
Dude, drunkposting like Dozy does?
Someone on the RIGHT said Obama was civil and nice to EVERYONE.
So.. can you figure out what fallacy that one is?
Need help again?
Dude, drunkposting like Dozy does?
Someone on the RIGHT said Obama was civil and nice to EVERYONE.
So.. can you figure out what fallacy that one is?
Need help again?
View attachment 215732
The game is over, it was not close, you lost. Don't worry, as you are accustom to, you get a participation prize.
Here is your prize.
The game is over, it was not close, you lost. Don't worry, as you are accustom to, you get a participation prize.
Here is your prize.
Hmm... how to reach him. Ok he plays video games with little kids online..
To be quite honest I'm not sure if W.C. here is in the Texas sharpshooter area or just tu quoque brush now.
WC (you know your initials are for the toilet right?)
"Sharpshooter's
The Sharpshooter's Fallacy gets its name from someone shooting a rifle at the side of the barn and then going over and drawing a target and bulls eye concentrically around the bullet hole. See the Fallacy of Selective Attention."
WC (you know your initials are for the toilet right?)
"Sharpshooter's
The Sharpshooter's Fallacy gets its name from someone shooting a rifle at the side of the barn and then going over and drawing a target and bulls eye concentrically around the bullet hole. See the Fallacy of Selective Attention."
Last edited: