The Trump foundation was placed under the supervision of the court and then was dissolved by the Trumps when they decided they did not want to continue because it would be a hassle and a conflict to address all of that during a presidency and the the accepted that as a resolution. I am not going to try the case here but the allegation was that it was not doing charitable work or work within the scope of its authorization. That's a tough argument to make for the NRA. As discussed, a case can be made possibly that there was misconduct/fraud (I don't know) and that individuals need to be prosecuted and removed but it is hard to make a case that the organization itself and its mission is bogus. In the Trump case, they agreed to dissolve as part of a settlement and no one was asking for continuation of the work under a court appointed or approved leadership.
I don't doubt that the NRA may decide to relocate some things to another state regardless of the outcome of the case but she is not going to get their assets or close them down as an organization. The Loon AG ran on a platform of harassing the NRA and Trump so she just wants the fight for her base. Although I can see the NRA fighting it bigtime just out of principle even though to just move might be easier. They have big legal bucks. Fine. Let the games begin. As I have conceded if there is organization wide misconduct I can recognize the power of the court to appoint/approve management under court direction. Dissolution? That's another matter. You have compared it to Trump's situation where he did not want the hassle so agreed to close. The NRA is up for the hassle.
Oh, and be careful tards. There is misconduct and a lot of loose gold digging going on in the NRA. a lot of NRA types would be happy to see some people there leave. If the court does its job right, it will result in a stronger NRA.
