This guy was last discussed about a year ago:
https://www.elitetrader.com/et/posts/4378628/
What bothers me is that he is so hung-up on this concept of mean-reversion using the 5 period EMA.
But he has no backtesting results and no actual trading results using his "concept".
How does he know the 5 period EMA is any better than the 7, 10, or 13 period EMA's ?
I mean at one point in time the concept looks good......but I think not in whipsawing markets....as there is definitely a trend component to this. Plus the fact that he does not account for or adjust for volatility makes me wonder.
https://northmantrader.com/2018/01/03/yearly-charts/?subscribe=success#blog_subscription-5
I'd love to backtest this thing, but what are the exact entry and exit rules ?
https://www.elitetrader.com/et/posts/4378628/
What bothers me is that he is so hung-up on this concept of mean-reversion using the 5 period EMA.
But he has no backtesting results and no actual trading results using his "concept".
How does he know the 5 period EMA is any better than the 7, 10, or 13 period EMA's ?
I mean at one point in time the concept looks good......but I think not in whipsawing markets....as there is definitely a trend component to this. Plus the fact that he does not account for or adjust for volatility makes me wonder.
https://northmantrader.com/2018/01/03/yearly-charts/?subscribe=success#blog_subscription-5
I'd love to backtest this thing, but what are the exact entry and exit rules ?