Proof is only relevant if you have a 3-5 years profitable track record, and a statistically significant number of trades. Both requirements are still missing, so you have nothing relevant till now. At least drawdowns, sharp ratio and consistency need to be included in the analysis as well. The fact that you only speak about profitability shows that you are a newbie, just like all of us when we started trading. 1 positive element (being profitable for 6 months) does not make you "special", for being "special" you need much more.
And even then the evolution of your account should be analyzed. If you have a first year with 250% profits and after that 4 consecutive losing years with total losses of 200%, you are still profitable but nobody will ever invest in your trading.
I read somewhere online “
Traders don’t make 100%-200% annual returns.
In fact, almost 100% of retail traders lose money.”
I don’t know how true that is. But my mentor told even if you made $1 by end of the year as a beginner you have beaten 90% of the traders out there. I don’t look to make 250% profit like you claim that I made. Heck most hedge funds could barely beat the market each year and they have more money than you and I.
So stop trolling and hating. I’m gonna continue doing my thing.