The Next Big Thing

every several years these type of scams/stories surface in the economy.

i remember a traveling show with a guy who had an engine that burned water for fuel.

this is the same thing couched in scientific jibber jabber.


it is mostly fabricated.


surf
 
Quote from brokershopping:



It is just that a SUB ground state would be so absolutely incredible, it is very hard to believe. It is not something along the lines of mixing chemicals to create a novel reaction. It is a MUCH bigger deal.
More...

http://nextbigfuture.com/2009/02/jovion-corporation-gets-patent-for-zero.html

What is very clear is that a new branch of science is being born. This new field leverages chemical reactions performed in exclusion fields created by closely spaced metal plates. These exclusion fields are recognized by both QED theory and The casimir effect. The two theories dispute whether closely spaced plates are pulled together electrostatically or pushed together by virtual particles. The hydrino neatly bypasses the argument because both theories agree that bracing the plates apart forms a permanent exclusion field where longer wavelength vacuum flucuations are restricted. It is this property that converts the hydrogen atom into a hydrino not a chemical reaction. Blacklight Power (BLP) and Cal-Tech both claim diffusing hydrogen atoms through the field allows them to fall to a sub zero state. I believe that Cal-Tech and BLP wrongly attribute energy emission to this falling orbital. I am convinced the orbital energy is unchanged, it is the lower ratio of large to small virtual particles in the exclusion field effecting the micro gravity well of the atom. If there are more small virtual particles than large virtual particles keeping the orbital away from the proton then it is actually the boundary that bends and the electron simply remains stationary relative to the boundary!

The energy gains reported can only be accounted for logically if a covalent bond is formed between 2 atoms while inside this exclusion field. If not the atoms will simply return to their original axis or radius while exiting the field without claiming any energy as it unbends along the boundary condition back to what we call zero state in normal space. The covalent bond is the knot we need to rectify the change in boundary conditions while exiting the field. IF you form a molecule while in this state you release energy AND you lock the orbitals together so that they can no longer translate freely back to normal space. This forces the normally chaotic virtual particles to organize and tear the bond apart by its' orbitals when it tries to exit the field. This then requires nature to resupply the hydrogen atoms to monatomic energy levels.

In the real world these plates are realized as cavities that are mechanically or chemically formed. Cal Tech uses stacks of metal plates drilled with arrays of sub micron holes. BLP uses skeletal catalysts like Rayney nickel which are cavitities chemically leached out of the softer AL metal in a Nickel - AL alloy
 
From my vast knowledge of quantum physics(almost none), no laws of regular physics apply, because quantum physics has the ability to write the laws of physics.

So thermodynamics would not apply.

That being said, this still sounds like the cold fusion scam of a few decades ago.
 
Quote from Rehoboth:

That being said, this still sounds like the cold fusion scam of a few decades ago.
More...

It's different this time. :) Yeah, one can't help but be skeptical of fantastic claims. One can hope though, right? But there is a very large political group that has no intention of giving abundant, cheap power to mankind:

The first is a general distrust of a society with abundant energy supplies. We find Stanford professor Paul Ehrlich, an antinuclear environmental spokesman, stating: "In fact, giving society cheap abundant energy at this point would be the equivalent of giving an idiot child a machine gun."Amory Lovins of Friends of the Earth puts it this way: "If you ask me, it'd be a little short of disasterous for us to discover a source of clean, cheap, abundant energy because of what we would do with it. We ought to be looking for energy sources that are adequate for our needs, but that won't give us the excesses of concentrated energy with which we could do mischief to the earth or to each other." (Kaku, p. 242)
More...

http://atomicinsights.blogspot.com/2005/11/cheap-energy-quotes-from-nuclear-power.html

.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top