The New Bull Market

Quote from Wallace:

This is late coming and tho there's been a few posts related to the New Bull Market
no one seems to have trashed the 'Triple Top' theory that never happened.
Perhaps like me you were sucked into believing the end-of-the-world was at hand —
not so.

The Major Buy was way back in March 2009 , and regardless of the talk back then of
a triple top to come, more than 7,700 points of profit would have to accumulate before
the DJIA reached that triple top point, and for the S&P 500 , about 909 points or in terms
of the profit trading one ES contract - a mere $45,500 for a straight Buy&Hold until the
week of April 26 2013 when the S&P finally broke free of that triple top fear that the
DJIA had already broken some six weeks earlier.

Between 1999 and 2009 a massive market correction occurred that beginning in 2009
started the next leg up of the New Bull Market. If you haven't got that yet get it now
because when people talk about the Dow going into the 20,000s and the S&P breaking
2,100 , 2,500 , 2,700 , they're right.

Oh and the 'economy', 'employment' and 'QE' yada yada yada
Slowly rising interest rates may do some good; at some point the potential profits to
be obtained from lending will cause banks' greed to overcome their past miserly
behaviour toward all those loan applicants they'd previously rejected. This change
should move lending from an easing to a gush of 'please, take the money' which in
turn will boost the economy and employment which will begin to catch up with what
the markets have been doing for the past FIVE years.

Wow!

I've followed your commentary many times before, but can't help feel like this is your "jumped the shark" moment.
 
jeeze, Tsing Tao, how long have you been waiting to use that one




as I said in the first post, I'm late coming to this, and it's actually a bit of a rant

cnbc is repetitive beyond belief and one of their mantras has been 'when are the
retail investors going to come into the market ?'. now they're into 'is this the top yet ?
is this the top yet ? is this the top yet ?' so I've been influenced a bit by that

when the downside was going new posts/threads in this forum were running to two
pages and sometimes more, but since then and perhaps the beginning of the year
new threads have barely gone half a page

so all in all it is a bit surprising that there hasn't been more 'Buy ! Buy ! Buy !' threads
being posted, and is I suppose, all I'm saying
 
the problem is all the people talking on tv make a pretty good living. there is a disconnect because they don't have a job paying 70k that they can replaced for 30k. you have people seeing the stock market at highs that's it. they don't care if someone is making 70k or 30k because all they see is a ton of free money. when you have a bull market at some point you need to have workers making money to spend it but this an economy for the rich only and i don't understand how you will see sales growth without decent paying jobs. earnings means nothing if you pay people a lot less to worker because who is going to spend the money to grow the economy. ben did not do one thing to help average americans he only gave the rich people all there money back.
 
Quote from brokerboy:

the problem is all the people talking on tv make a pretty good living. there is a disconnect because they don't have a job paying 70k that they can replaced for 30k. you have people seeing the stock market at highs that's it. they don't care if someone is making 70k or 30k because all they see is a ton of free money. when you have a bull market at some point you need to have workers making money to spend it but this an economy for the rich only and i don't understand how you will see sales growth without decent paying jobs. earnings means nothing if you pay people a lot less to worker because who is going to spend the money to grow the economy. ben did not do one thing to help average americans he only gave the rich people all there money back.

just wanted to add one point here.

America has tens of millions of workers making say 30-40-50k a year. I don't know the data but say American average income for workers has stayed the same over last 5 years or maybe has declined by 5%.

India and China has hundreds of millions of workers who used to make 5k-7k-9k a year, but now have started to make 10k-12k-15k a year. So, average worker income in India, China, Brazil, Russia etc. has gone up 20-40-50% over the last 5 years. So, if you see a disconnect between stock market performance (big multinational companies) vs average American worker living conditions, its explainable by the developments happening across the globe.

Above is what I think could be a reason. I could be completely wrong though! :)
 
Quote from gmst:


America has tens of millions of workers making say 30-40-50k a year. I don't know the data but say American average income for workers has stayed the same over last 5 years or maybe has declined by 5%.

India and China has hundreds of millions of workers who used to make 5k-7k-9k a year, but now have started to make 10k-12k-15k a year. So, average worker income in India, China, Brazil, Russia etc. has gone up 20-40-50% over the last 5 years. So, if you see a disconnect between stock market performance (big multinational companies) vs average American worker living conditions, its explainable by the developments happening across the globe.

About 50% of S&P 500 revenue and profits are earned outside the US. Emerging markets with fast growing incomes providing most of the growth.
Since the US is less than 5% of the world population, ultimately the economies outside the US can drive the US stock indices (composed largely of multinational corporations), which can become completely disconnected from the US economy. Same thing with the FTSE in England.
 
that's totally on the money but my point is its not in the american workers hands to spend. you think american companies are selling products to people making 10k a year in china? they are just the cheap labor but that won't make sales growth for US companies. there is no sales growth in years its all cost cutting.

i would just like to know where these good paying jobs will be for the amazing economy people talking is coming. in the late 90's temp jobs where paying 70k a year.

Quote from gmst:

just wanted to add one point here.

America has tens of millions of workers making say 30-40-50k a year. I don't know the data but say American average income for workers has stayed the same over last 5 years or maybe has declined by 5%.

India and China has hundreds of millions of workers who used to make 5k-7k-9k a year, but now have started to make 10k-12k-15k a year. So, average worker income in India, China, Brazil, Russia etc. has gone up 20-40-50% over the last 5 years. So, if you see a disconnect between stock market performance (big multinational companies) vs average American worker living conditions, its explainable by the developments happening across the globe.

Above is what I think could be a reason. I could be completely wrong though! :)
 
Quote from pikachu9:

About 50% of S&P 500 revenue and profits are earned outside the US. Emerging markets with fast growing incomes providing most of the growth.
Since the US is less than 5% of the world population, ultimately the economies outside the US can drive the US stock indices (composed largely of multinational corporations), which can become completely disconnected from the US economy. Same thing with the FTSE in England.

So it seems someone agrees with my hypothesis and my hypothesis does seem to have a little bit of validity :)

Based on above argument, it seems that Russel 2000/3000 companies will more closely mirror what is happening locally in the US market.
 
It's all about market cycles, no cycle, lasts forever, identify them correctly using long term charts and avoid calling tops and bottoms.

The rest is money manegement.
 
Quote from Wallace:

jeeze, Tsing Tao, how long have you been waiting to use that one




as I said in the first post, I'm late coming to this, and it's actually a bit of a rant

cnbc is repetitive beyond belief and one of their mantras has been 'when are the
retail investors going to come into the market ?'. now they're into 'is this the top yet ?
is this the top yet ? is this the top yet ?' so I've been influenced a bit by that

when the downside was going new posts/threads in this forum were running to two
pages and sometimes more, but since then and perhaps the beginning of the year
new threads have barely gone half a page

so all in all it is a bit surprising that there hasn't been more 'Buy ! Buy ! Buy !' threads
being posted, and is I suppose, all I'm saying

I just thought to use "that one" when I saw this thread!

I trust you're going to show us how you've gone long ES or something, right? I mean, conviction of this magnitude should have personal backing.
 
The Nikkei is in a crazy bull market. Its up nearly 2000 points in about a month....every single night its up 100-400 points.

Crossed 15k tonight. Almost higher than the Dow and just to think it was under 9000 last year. Up almost 100% in one single year. This is what irrational markets look like here and around the world, like I said asset bubbles are everywhere.
 
Back
Top