Quote from Hello:
you are an idiot, Social security costs are set to spiral out of control in the next 10 years, and cost us about 25 trillion or more over the next 75 years.
Thus, $3.7 trillion is not what is needed over the next 75 years. It is what the federal government would have to invest right now to meet the Social Security's 75-year shortfall.
Since the federal government isn't going to come up with an extra $3.7 trillion to invest tomorrow, a more useful figure in understanding the shortfall is the "cumulative cost." That is the cost to the taxpayers, over a 75-year period, of paying off all the treasury bonds in the Social Security trust fund plus meeting all the obligations of Social Security once the trust fund runs dry. Using data from the 2004 Trustees' report, that number is (sit down) $24.9 trillion in inflation-adjusted dollars! That is an annual average of $332 billion extra that the taxpayers will have to pony up for Social Security. Even that doesn't tell the full story because included are the years 2004-2018 when Social Security is still running a surplus. After 2018, the annual Social Security deficit grows quickly: By 2022 taxpayers will have to pay almost $100 billion above what they will shell out in payroll taxes to meet all of Social Security's obligations. That will reach over $200 billion in 2027, over $300 billion in 2033, and $400 billion in 2046. If you are under 40 years of age, chances are quite good you will live to see all of those dates.
http://spectator.org/archives/2005/01/19/the-true-cost-of-social-securi
Quote from Mav88:
California didn't fight a war, California is in deep financial shit, guess why.
Quote from Mav88:
Why do these braindead assertions even continue? Why in the face of simple refuting arithmetic do people even try to make false assertions that somehow social and corporate welfare is affordable and defense is the culprit, and that we can afford more of this?
total war tally ~ $2.5T
social welfare unfunded obligations >>$40T
Social welfare outlays 2009, pensions health and welfare: (federal, state local): $2.5T, 41% of total gov't spending
War and the DoD ~$790B 13% of total govt spending
Constitution says to provide for the common defense, and the GENERAL welfare, not individual welfare
Quote from Mav88:
Why do these braindead assertions even continue? Why in the face of simple refuting arithmetic do people even try to make false assertions that somehow social and corporate welfare is affordable and defense is the culprit, and that we can afford more of this?
total war tally ~ $2.5T
social welfare unfunded obligations >>$40T
Quote from Hello:
These are the dumb fucks who voted Obama in and now will be responsible for the complete destruction of the United States. Their solution to the disaster which is coming from our unfunded liabilities was to create a new government entitlement program to try to clean up the old ones which have over 100 trillion in combined liabilities.

That is the biggest load of crap,TODAY,social security has a huge surplus,cant say the same about the wars.
We have borrowed over 3.7 trillion from ss,that has saved the US lots of money since they didn't have to borrow that money from elsewhere and have to pay huge sums in interest
to fix it all that is needed is a small tax increases