Democrats counted on money and Hispanic voters to deliver a blue wave. They didn't.
Money isn't predictive and, it turns out, neither are midterm elections. Also, Donald Trump doesn't turn off all Hispanic and Black voters.
Paul Brandus
Opinion columnist
There's a lot we don't know yet about this consequential 2020 election, but already there are lessons to be learned from it:
►Midterm elections aren’t necessarily predictive of presidential election years. President Donald Trump’s name wasn’t on the ballot in 2018, but Democrats succeeded in making it about him anyway. And what happened? A blue wave election that
flipped the House of Representatives and put the
speaker’s gavel in Rep. Nancy Pelosi's hands.
This gave never-Trumpers hope that the 2020 election — when Trump's name would be on the ballot — would produce a similar wave. But Ronald Reagan was shellacked in the
1982 midterms and
won re-election just two years later in a landslide. Bill Clinton’s Democrats took a drubbing in the
1994 midterm, losing control of both the House and Senate, but Clinton was easily reelected —
with 379 electoral votes — two years later. And most recently, Democrats were thrashed in the
2010 midterms, while President Barack
Obama went on to win 332 electoral votes and reelection in 2012.
Susan Collins and Iowa’s
Joni Ernst, as well as South Carolina Sen.
Lindsey Graham's surprisingly comfortable victory margin, Republicans may even hang on to the Senate — a crushing blow for Democrats.
►Spending the most money isn’t always predictive.
Hillary Clinton spent twice as much as Trump four years ago. How did that work out?
This time around was similar. Joe Biden raised enormous amounts of money:
nearly three-quarters of a billion dollars in August and September combined, for example. It may get him to 270 electoral votes and the presidency, but that kind of cash raised hopes for a resounding outcome that's not in the cards.
The Trump campaign, meanwhile,
burned through much of its cash early and by October was struggling financially. Yet he far outperformed expectations.
Election chaos: Keep calm, keep counting and get to work
And speaking of South Carolina's Senate race, that may be the starkest example of how money can be overrated. Democratic challenger
Jaime Harrison raised more than $100 million, including $57 million during the final full quarter of the campaign,
the most in a single quarter than any Senate candidate in history — by far. What did that get him?
About 42% of the vote. Graham, who was reduced to
begging for cash on Fox, last night had the last laugh about his easier-than-expected romp.
state Sen. Oscar Braynon, a Black Miami Democrat, told Politico last weekend. “I can speculate about the reasons, but the fact is it remains concerning.”
Biden campaign discouraged staffers from knocking on doors and talking face-to-face with voters; the Trump campaign plowed ahead.
Meantime, Trump appears to have done a good job of slicing and dicing
among the state’s diverse Hispanic groups. Cuban-Americans, Puerto Rican-Americans, and such aren’t the same and have their own individual concerns. Many Cubans who fled communist persecution, for example, always want to hear about political freedom, economic opportunity and so forth. Many Hispanics also
like Trump's pro-business reputation, his anti-regulatory stance,and the perception (which isn't true) that he's a
religious guy.
To our next president: 10 priorities for fixing our justice system
Some Hispanics also
approve of the president's crackdown on undocumented immigrants. That was instrumental in his Florida win.
When all the dust settles, Biden will still easily win the Black and Hispanic vote — but not by the kinds of margins that he needed. This also helps explain why other states like
Texas, with its whopping 38 electoral votes, stayed red.
All this suggests Democrats will be asking themselves a lot of questions, no matter who the winners are when all the results are in.