The Narrative is Crumbling

trudeau racist.jpg
 
Since We're Taking Shots....

  • Insufficient data on intermediate and long-term effects. I can't "un-take" a shot and whatever it does, it does. Since the firms in question were given a nearly-blanket and impenetrable liability shield I trust exactly nothing out of their mouths or anyone else's derived from their claims (that includes all the so-called "experts") because there is no way for me (or my heirs) to go to court and pound them if the product proves defective.
  • Zero evidence of long-term protection and, from the titers raised by the EUA trials, evidence that the manufacturers knew the protection, to whatever degree it was conferred, was temporary. This, standing alone, meant that whatever the risk profile was from the jabs it was almost-certainly not a one-time bargain. What we didn't (and still don't) know is what the multiplicative factor is with repeated insults. No matter how small a risk is if you put an exponential multiplier on it enough times you're going to get screwed. I did not fail math in High School.

We can't look. So says Pfizer, Moderna and J&J. So says the FDA.

"Eat this, inject that!" says the doctor.

"Show me the data", says I.

"No." says the doctor and the government.

Well then **** you sir,

https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=245013
 
Van_der_Voort_4 said:
Since We're Taking Shots....

  • Insufficient data on intermediate and long-term effects. I can't "un-take" a shot and whatever it does, it does. Since the firms in question were given a nearly-blanket and impenetrable liability shield I trust exactly nothing out of their mouths or anyone else's derived from their claims (that includes all the so-called "experts") because there is no way for me (or my heirs) to go to court and pound them if the product proves defective.
  • Zero evidence of long-term protection and, from the titers raised by the EUA trials, evidence that the manufacturers knew the protection, to whatever degree it was conferred, was temporary. This, standing alone, meant that whatever the risk profile was from the jabs it was almost-certainly not a one-time bargain. What we didn't (and still don't) know is what the multiplicative factor is with repeated insults. No matter how small a risk is if you put an exponential multiplier on it enough times you're going to get screwed. I did not fail math in High School.

We can't look. So says Pfizer, Moderna and J&J. So says the FDA.

"Eat this, inject that!" says the doctor.

"Show me the data", says I.

"No." says the doctor and the government.

Well then **** you sir,

https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=245013
More...


You are shoveling complete nonsense again.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top