The MSM Is Right: There Is a Racist Party in America

The MSM Is Right: There Is a Racist Party in America
By Tom Trinko
The mainstream media (MSM) are right. There is a political party today that has racism as a core value and is working incessantly to keep blacks down. It's the Democratic Party. Of course, since Democrat politicians never say what they really believe, most Democrat voters aren't aware they're supporting racism.

Like their predecessors who fought a war to keep slavery legal, who founded the KKK, who passed the Jim Crow laws, who fought for school segregation, and who opposed the Civil Rights Act of 1964, modern Democrat politicians are constantly working to ensure that blacks be poor, ignorant, and totally dependent on the government.

Slave-owning Democrats believed that blacks were not really smart enough to run their own lives.

Modern Democrat talking heads constantly declare that in a country where Japanese Americans could go from Democrat-mandated prison camps to having one of the highest per household incomes in America, without Democrat help, blacks somehow can't manage to do anything. It's the same paternalistic attitude that earlier Democrats used to justify slavery.

Of course, the new slavery is different from the old: instead of picking cotton for hours in the blazing sun, modern blacks only have to vote Democrat, settle for unsafe neighborhoods, and be willing to live with the fact that their children will never get a decent education.

Charter schools and private schools have proven that they can educate black inner-city children. Black parents go to extreme lengths to get their kids in those schools because blacks love their kids, too. Yet Democrat politicians are constantly opposing those schools, and the idea of school choice, because they apparently care more about the millions the teacher unions pour into Democrat coffers than they do about black children getting a decent education.

What better recipe for securing the black vote than ensuring that blacks depend on government for life itself while using the compliant MSM to convince them that their problems are all due to Republicans – who, of course, have no power in the cities those blacks live in? This is another reason why it's necessary to make sure blacks can't get a decent education. Ignorant, uneducated people of any race are more likely to fall for propaganda, after all.

Democrat politicians have even figured out how to use taxpayer dollars to pay for keeping blacks around to vote. Their slave-owning predecessors had to at least pay to feed and house their slaves.

If you're saying, "No, this can't be so," then ponder a few "inconvenient truths."

In America, thousands of blacks are shot each year in Democrat-run cities, yet Democrats who run those cities with an iron fist do nothing that works to fix the problem. While one could believe that a non-racist might think for a few years that gun control actually protects law-abiding blacks, only someone who doesn't have black interests at heart could continue to believe so after decades of failure.

Note too that it's not thousands of whites who are getting shot in Chiraq (that is, Chicago), nor is it white neighborhoods where it's unsafe during the day. If you're black, you're 12 times more likely to be shot than if you're white in Chiraq, where Democrats have ruled since dinosaurs roamed the Illinois plains.

Democrats got far more riled up about a police officer shooting a black criminal in self-defense, according to Obama's DOJ, than they did about a nine-year-old black boy being the targeted victim of a gang hit. Why? Could it be that white liberals hate the cops and don't really care about blacks?

Democrats are also big fans of Planned Parenthood even though PP's founder was an avowed racist who viewed blacks as inferior. It's possible to be pro-choice but not a racist, of course. But it makes one wonder why Democrats aren't upset about the fact that the leading cause of death for black Americans is abortion. That Democrats continue to laud PP even though 79% of PP "clinics" are in or near minority neighborhoods is also strange if Democrats really care about blacks.The recent call by Democrats for taxpayer funding of abortions because that will "save money" is nothing less than saying that aborting the babies of people on welfare will save money. Note that when rich liberal Democrats talk about people on welfare, it's really unlikely that they're thinking about whites.

If Democrat politicians really aren't racists, it's odd that there are no Democrats saying abortion should be legal but that we should do something about the fact that a black woman is five times more likely to have an abortion than a white woman.

Then there's welfare. The entire supposed pivot of Democrats on racism is based on their support for welfare, which "rescued" blacks from poverty.

That hasn't worked too well, given that black poverty is still twice that of white poverty.

More importantly, welfare has contributed to the destruction of the black family and the resulting culture that makes it very hard for even very dedicated blacks to escape the ghetto. With 70% of blacks born to single mothers and with being in a single-parent family being the strongest correlation with drug use, criminality, teen pregnancy, and poverty, people who care about blacks, like the Republicans who pushed for welfare reform, would demand change.

If Democrats cared about blacks, they'd have noticed the problem by the 1970s and tried to fix it. Instead, they doubled down on the same failed approaches. But if their objective is to keep blacks dependent and scared, maybe those policies weren't failures after all.

Finally, one has only to look at how Democrats treat blacks who wander off the Democrats' thought plantation to see that love of blacks is not at the core of the Democratic Party. If any Republican had talked about Obama the way Democrats talk about Ben Carson, Justice Clarence Thomas, and any number of other black conservative intellectuals, he'd have been tarred and feathered by the MSM.

It's a crime that 52 years after the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was passed, blacks are still being oppressed by the same Democratic Party that fought so hard for slavery 153 years ago.

Stop letting Democrat politicians get away with claiming to care when their actions show that their only concern is about votes. They helicopter into the black community every election cycle, explain how it's all the Republicans' fault, and then helicopter back to their tony neighborhoods, where their kids go to great schools and it's safe to walk at night.

Don't let Democrats get away with pretending to care about blacks while they fight tooth and nail against any policy that would give blacks a chance to earn their share of the American Dream.

It's time that America threw off the Democrat legacy of preventing blacks from reaching their true potential. It's time to end the nearly 200-year-long Democrat war on blacks and bring down the last vestiges of racism in America.

http://www.americanthinker.com/arti...right_there_is_a_racist_party_in_america.html
 
There is truth in what this thread is saying. The problem is that the people with the means of production don't want to share in the profits. So we continue with policies that while at one time were instituted with their heart in the right place, it has become a sham in modern times.

Let's be clear, I do believe in strong social safety nets. Republicans do not. That is fine that Republicans feel this way, but then workers either have to have strong [private] unions, or have to be able to share in the profits (note the implicit thought that republicans are mostly business owners - certainly not true in the age of the limousine democrat). The latter solves nearly every political problem in existence imo as I have professed in this thread, but it is so hard to implement because at the base of our ethnic system is the exploitation of one group over another. Worse, people want kings and father figures. They want to be told what to do. How else do you explain Jesus after 2000 years? It is a societal problem that may have roots in racism (tribalism?), but I doubt it. It is just that people perhaps even ingrained in their genetic code are wired to exploit each other. It is the [perceived] curse of Zero Sum; Red Queen;...

All this stuff (societal, economic, political, religious, philosophy) is so intertwined with the other like spaghetti and meatballs it is hard to unravel it anymore. But I do agree, to a certain extent, that Democrats abuse their apparent allegiance to the poor to their [the poor] detriment, at least in modern times. How else do you explain the total farce that is the near living-hell of the south side of Chicago? But every Sunday, like clockwork, black people go and pray to a guy that looks like this to help them out of poverty. You can't make this stuff up!

jesus2.jpg


One last thing. Trump has hit a terrible racist nerve in the US. That is not people's imagination that they feel targeted. He has done himself and the republican party a great disservice. Of course, that racial attack was on purpose. It is just that Democrats are inanely stupid. Either that, or they go to war with a fork:

  1. If your enemy is secure at all points, be prepared for him. If he is in superior strength, evade him. If your opponent is temperamental, seek to irritate him. Pretend to be weak, that he may grow arrogant. If he is taking his ease, give him no rest. If his forces are united, separate them. If sovereign and subject are in accord, put division between them. Attack him where he is unprepared, appear where you are not expected - The Art of War


 
Last edited:
You're an authority on republicans now? How do you know they don't believe in a strong safety net? Libertarians do also. The only ones who don't are people who want everything to be a safety net. Stand in line for your handout.
 
Let's be clear, I do believe in strong social safety nets. Republicans do not.[/MEDIA]

This is not true. Republicans believe in social safety nets. However Republicans believe that social safety nets should be short term measure not something that is provided perpetually to those with no desire to better themselves. The dole should not be lifestyle.

Welfare, food stamps, section 8 and other social programs should be provided for a set maximum period of time. To receive these benefits the individual receiving them should meet milestones for responsibly improving their situation, and stay free of criminal activity & drugs.
 
nitro: "Let's be clear, I do believe in strong social safety nets. Republicans do not"

what leftists believe in most of all is abortion. and their way of "supporting" the poor leads to blacks having abortions at a hugely higher rate than whites.
 
There is truth in what this thread is saying. The problem is that the people with the means of production don't want to share in the profits."

Not to be a nitpicker, but haven't you ever heard of a dividend ?
 
Last edited:
Not to be a nitpicker, but haven't you ever heard of a dividend ?
What are you doing on a trading website? Do you realize the risk you have to take to capture that dividend? The stock market creates wealth, but unfortunately it is for people that have money to invest and have money they can afford to lose. That is THE first rule of all investing. Not people that have to make a choice between starving their children or they have to get a new set of tires or fix the breaks for their car so they can get to work.

So you want people that can't afford to eat to gamble buying stocks to capture a dividend once every three months? So they maybe can scrape up $300 to by ten shares of GE, so they can get a, drum roll, $5 dividend? Are you fucking serious?

Although, ______if________ you meant that employees should also be showered lavishly with stock ________________________options_____________________ with no risk to the employee, the way the CEO is, then I am all for it!

When do we start with that program? Yesterday?
 
Last edited:
Give them some stock options and fire them if it doesn't perform. ha, ha, yet is still not illegal to invest pension funds in the stock market. S&P has been paying 2%, more risk loaning low interest money to the fed. If I waited until I had money I could afford to lose I would still be waiting. By the way it has been illegal to pay w-2 workers in stock for a long time.
 
Back
Top