The Most Insightful Articles ABout Trading and Investing!

Quote from Nebuchadnezzar:

It is a basic econometric pattern of any trend. Combine it with the volume and you got the 1,2,3 formation. All markets conform to that pattern.

It is a basic econometric pattern of any trend in a hypothetical world.It doesnt always correspond,if not to say more it correspondes only on a few occasions.

It could be B2B 2R 2B for long as it could B2R 2R 2B or B2B2B2B 2R 2B 2R 4B 4R etc etc etc etc....the same way, for the same 1-2-3 points.
 
Quote from Nebuchadnezzar:

The problem is differentiating retrace from reversal, a pullback from change in trend.

I think it doesn`t matter in a gambling theory whether it is retrace or reversal.
 
Quote from jack hershey:

You are INCORRECT.

Stay that way if you wish.

The mathematics of markets is Boolean algebra (See George Boole in the 1840's)

Unfortunately, most people who use Boolean Algebra do not know what unit of measure to use.

It is a vector and it is not relatede to time in any real and practical way.

your mind like Nez's is probably filled with things that do not interconnect and never will. this circumstance precludes a person being able to differentiate his mind properly.

the reason is simple; the mind does not erase. Too bad for you guys. It was your choice

Logical calculus has nothing to do with your approach and the vector is not the unit of measurement. You are consistently borrowing concepts from real discipline but I think you have no idea what you are talking about cause you sound like you have an aphasia. If the fractal fails, it can't be a f*king fractal anymore, it couldn't be a fractal in the first place to begin with. It never was. What was is spydertrader posting his charts with 1,2 and 3 on them. And all of them if degaped with the following day produce incorrect order of events. Every single one of them. How the hell he could possibly trade off those charts if the manner in which he assigned the order of events was inconsistent with market operation.

As soon as the person asks themselves that question, they will immediately realize that you people are fakes and frauds.
 
Quote from jack hershey:



This is all TA that works as founded on a deductive Scientific Method. Add a second page to each of the 8 steps with the deductive process you used to prove each step works based on scientific deduction. By doing each of these steps by scientific deduction you do not deny your self the opportunity to build the blocks of this system from the ground up.

The Scientific Method also ditates to you the kind of mathematics which must be used in trading. Put you write up on this facet before all the 8 steps so you know the MATHEMETICAL BASIS OF YOUR SCIENTIFIC DEDUCTIONS.

You looking at the chart and seeing LTL being broken with close in the zone produces resumption - this is induction and a naive one. Sane person taking this as a rule and testing to see if it holds true - this is deductive activity. Anybody can degap charts posted by spydertrader and see for themselves that HE GOT THE ORDER OF EVENTS WRONG for the next day. Supposedly he was trading off those charts. Sane person seeing that all his charts anticipated wrong what must develop on the next day in order for those annotations to be correct - this is analysis. Coming to conclusion that he and you are fakes and frauds is simply logical. For everything else there is a master card.
 
Quote from Nebuchadnezzar:

Logical calculus has nothing to do with your approach and the vector is not the unit of measurement. You are consistently borrowing concepts from real discipline but I think you have no idea what you are talking about cause you sound like you have an aphasia.

When someone is saying the he`s started trading 50+ years ago and he is saying that time and time againg,it would be enough to get that he is so far away from trading now.It`s like the veteran`s memories about the WWI.
 
Quote from jack hershey:

Yes, many people came and spent a day with Spyder.

He did carefully point out the single pattern that occurs in markets. B2B 2R 2B for long and R2R 2B 2R for short. The pattern is a P, V pattern and it shows the relationship of price following volume.

From this, person always knows WMCN. For example, I have posted a day ahead the next 18 to 22 trades for the following day. This included the time and price of the pm BO as well. Secondly, in december one year I posted the seven price moves of the economy for the following year. Then it happened over the process of the year.

None of this is predicting at all. All it is is knowing WMCN based on the interlocking relationships of fractals and how they are built from the finest market granularity to the present very slow fractal Depression we are experiencing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------
The purpose of annotations is for a trader to keep track of where she is in the order of the events. Every single chart annotated by spydertrader can be degapped and compared with the next day to see if "what must come next" based on today's annotations has developed tomorrow. Without a fail, it never did. Spydertrader never got WMCN right. Not a single time. Doing due diligence on his crap is time consuming. But it is worth it. Any sane person can review his charts, look at the next day, see that based on gaussians of various thickness his pre-flight check was wrong every single time. The first question comes to mind: if he was supposed to have traded off his annotations -- ARE YOU F*NG MAD. Am I talking to a bot? A hershey bot? WTF?
 
Another example of avoiding the hard truth

"Jack! Jack! Lighten up, man! The likelihood that you can make me feel like shit in a pure print medium is nil. Probably not even in person. You're not that good. If I REALLY wanted to rag on you, I could make you cry. In print. Intimations of mortality. Regrets. Trespasses unforgiven. Opportunities missed. Time wasted. Dreams not now achievable. The feeling of helplessness. But I digress.

And for your demented information, I spend all 390 minutes of RMH communing with market metrics that would give you a hard-on, if you could still get it up. Metrics that tell you why markets sometimes top without an FTT. That tell you why a succession of reverses that look like FTTs are really bouncing off of a trend line you can't see. That indicate continuation without hurting your head trying to divine what those sluggish volume bars are going to do. Using NQ ITSELF as a leading indicator for itself. All with no fear or anxiety because they are all I quantified, coded, properly thresholded, deconflicted, and tested."

Jack "the bullshiter" Hershey slipped away quietly.
 
Quote from jack hershey:


-----------------------------------
I do not believe it is fair in any way for an uniformed person to take potshots at things they know nothing about. Obviously this site cannot be moderated in any way to eliminate such trashing. I am pointing out this trash talk because my name was trashed by posting improperly.
--------------------------------
I am very f*ing informed, believe me. This is no trashing. This is a statement of fact. We just had the VE on ES didn't close in the zone, and low and behold, there was another freaking resumption. Only a blind person can't see that. It would've been another loss for a trader following your rules. You were very specific about the zones and the closes.

I am not your regular variety bypasser who takes the crack at you for fun. I am very thorough, having researched everything and contemplated carefully what has been written on the subject.

This is not a trash talk. This a pure unadulterated truth. You are a fraud and so is Spydetrader.

Your meetings were prescreened not to allow people with any brains and self-respect. Who else is gong to sit through the demonstration of trading approach on hand drawn bars instead of real market.

What a freaking joke!
 
Back
Top