The Moronic Life of Tugger Carlson

[BeautifulStranger]

When someone shits their pants (that's you), what would be the point of a "counter argument?"

You are babbling again. If you can't or will not address my arguments, why bother responding? Hopefully you weren't projecting with your last post.

 

[Frederick Foresight]

Hopefully you weren't projecting with your last post.

No, it was you who was "projectiling."

 

[Cuddles]

Admit it. Mainstream media got caught cherry picking footage to bolster their narrative that January 6th was a insurrection. We know it was not Tucker Carlson cherry picking because the "discovered" footage is now 14 motnhs old. Why was this footage not made available to the public earlier? Was this footage available to the courts before protesters were sentanced to prison?

Just read U.S. District Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil's opinion, leaning heavily on the arguments of Fox's lawyers: The "'general tenor' of the show should then inform a viewer that [Carlson] is not 'stating actual facts' about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in 'exaggeration' and 'non-literal commentary.' "

She wrote: "Fox persuasively argues, that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrive with an appropriate amount of skepticism' about the statement he makes."

 

[easymon1]

Interesting that you have not come up with a counter argument,...You want people to shut up.

 

[BeautifulStranger]

View attachment 308285
View attachment 308286

It would be interesting to tally the impressions of people first watching the videos. This can be done, perhaps outside this US, not that it ever would be.

It is fascinating to watch Democrat politicians calling for regulation involving certain uses of AI. Impartial weighing on evidence of corruption abounds, perhaps? As it is, AI is being given exclusive determination on people's identities in certain situations. There are several AI related articles in Ars Technica that are relevant to this discussion.

 

[exGOPer]

Nice try at attempting to mischaracterize my post.

The videos are the videos. All the videos are evidence, not just the ones the media decides to show. The newly released videos show the Capitol police escorting Shaman man in a helpful way as evidenced by them attempting to open various doors for him. This is in contrast to what police do when they see someone as a threat. As far as what ultimately happened, perhaps we will be shown all the videos and an accurate timeline will be created of events, locations, and participants so that the public can get proper perspective what truly happened on January 6th. What I'm requesting is not a forte of our media or nowadays, the FBI, so it is up to us to draw our own conclusions. We are only able to draw reasonable conclusions when we see all the evidence, right?

Are you aware that a huge majority of police types are Pro-Trump? Is it a surprise they welcomed in the Trump supporters?

Also just because they were welcomed into the public area, doesn't mean they were escorted into the private offices and the chamber itself. And how many stopped and walked away when they were told to go outside?

Nice try though, Tucker got you fooled as usual.

 

[easymon1]

Are you aware that a huge majority of police types are Pro-Trump? Is it a surprise they welcomed in the Trump supporters?

Also just because they were welcomed into the public area, doesn't mean they were escorted into the private offices and the chamber itself. And how many stopped and walked away when they were told to go outside?

Nice try though, Tucker got you fooled as usual.

What can you tell us about Ray Epps, GoPee?

 

[exGOPer]

What can you tell us about Ray Epps, GoPee?

Fox News literally admitted to lying about the elections IN COURT. Tucker carlsons legal defense for a court case was no one who’s actually coherent should believe what tucker and Fox News says or publishes. You dumb fucks are so delusional you just ignore what’s right in front of your face.

 

[easymon1]

Fox News literally admitted to lying about the elections IN COURT. Tucker carlsons legal defense for a court case was no one who’s actually coherent should believe what tucker and Fox News says or publishes. You dumb fucks are so delusional you just ignore what’s right in front of your face.

lol, who's Tucker Carlson, did he break in the capitol, GoPee, lol.
Now, about Ray Ray, is that the sum total of what you can tell us about Ray Ray? Zilch, Nothing, Nada?
Pittiful attempt to distract from the issue. You better get a troll school brushup! LOL GoPeeeeeee

 

[BeautifulStranger]

Are you aware that a huge majority of police types are Pro-Trump? Is it a surprise they welcomed in the Trump supporters?

Also just because they were welcomed into the public area, doesn't mean they were escorted into the private offices and the chamber itself. And how many stopped and walked away when they were told to go outside?

Nice try though, Tucker got you fooled as usual.

Not saying that you are not a reliable source of characterizations, but I really want to the see evidence before reaching a final conclusion. ALL the evidence.