The Moment The Democrats 'War on Police' Started

Obama outlined the template right here. Of course, it turned out Obama had absolutely no idea what he was talking about.


 
In a democracy, the people should control the police. In the U.S. the police do not obey the law and are out of control. (This is a generalization of course and not true everywhere.) Has this police lawlessness reached the point that we are no longer a democracy on the local level, but instead a "police state"? (The U.S. has never been much of a democracy at the federal level.)
 
In a democracy, the people should control the police. In the U.S. the police do not obey the law and are out of control. (This is a generalization of course and not true everywhere.) Has this police lawlessness reached the point that we are no longer a democracy on the local level, but instead a "police state"? (The U.S. has never been much of a democracy at the federal level.)

If someone wrote that "blacks" are out of control and don't obey the law, the resident PC monitors would be all over them. Yet it would be far more accurate than your statement.

Most people can see that this is another cynical ploy by democrats desperate to keep their black voting bloc riled up. If they wanted to actually help blacks, would they be encouraging them to get into confrontations with the police? Or would they be demanding that they obey the law and respect others rights and property? Which is more likely to have a beneficial outcome for the people living in these areas? Which is aimed to benefit instead the racial grievance industry?
 
The so-called "war on police", which is really just long overdue pushback, was inevitable with the rise of the cellphone camera and the internet.
 
Odd to read so many post defending union led government employees, must be something in the kool aid;)
For some around here, the authority of "whites" over "blacks" is more important than that of management over employees, or that of the private sector over the public sector.
 
Last edited:
The so-called "war on police", which is really just long overdue pushback, was inevitable with the rise of the cellphone camera and the internet.

There's some truth to that. But the media chooses the theme and when.
 
If someone wrote that "blacks" are out of control and don't obey the law, the resident PC monitors would be all over them. Yet it would be far more accurate than your statement.

Most people can see that this is another cynical ploy by democrats desperate to keep their black voting bloc riled up. If they wanted to actually help blacks, would they be encouraging them to get into confrontations with the police? Or would they be demanding that they obey the law and respect others rights and property? Which is more likely to have a beneficial outcome for the people living in these areas? Which is aimed to benefit instead the racial grievance industry?
Oh, so that's it. The police are body slamming, choking, and kicking blacks, shoving broom sticks up their asses, breaking their necks and shooting them to keep the black voting block riled up until after the election. I've noticed this sort of policing is also pretty effective at stopping petty crime. You find some shoplifter (preferably a black or Mexican) shove a broomstick up their ass, break their neck and shoot them five times and chances are that's the last shoplifting they will be doing for a while.
 
Last edited:
Oh, so that's it. The police are body slamming, choking, and kicking blacks, shoving broom sticks up their asses, breaking their necks and shooting them to keep the black voting block riled up until after the election. I've noticed this sort of policing is also pretty effective at stopping petty crime. You find some shoplifter (preferably a black or Mexican) shove a broomstick up their ass, break their neck and shoot them five times and chances are that's the last shoplifting they will be doing for a while.
so everywhere, police are just kicking blacks around and shoving broom sticks up their asses LMAO. what a clown you are piehole.
 
Back
Top