The Media Narrative - all propaganda

[Tsing Tao]

Facts are not partisan. Right and wrong is not left and right.

Completely agree. But that wasn't at all the point. Here4money said I lived in a partisan bubble. I provided a quick and easy way to determine which one of us is more partisan than the other - by orders of magnitude. As expected, he declined to the challenge.

Then you came in with an unrelated - but true - comment. Thank you for your contribution.

 

[UsualName]

I kinda figured you wouldn't take that bet! We both know where it would lead.

Besides, what facts have you provided in our discussions?

All roads lead back to Skinny Joe from Philadelphia with you.

 

[TreeFrogTrader]

Facts are not partisan. Right and wrong is not left and right.

Facts only have value where uncovered, developed, exposed, pursued and acted upon.

And that process sure as hell IS partisan even if the underlying facts are not.

 

[UsualName]

Completely agree. But that wasn't at all the point. Here4money said I lived in a partisan bubble. I provided a quick and easy way to determine which one of us is more partisan than the other - by orders of magnitude. As expected, he declined to the challenge.

Then you came in with an unrelated - but true - comment. Thank you for your contribution.

What does more partisan have to do with Skinny Joey?

 

[UsualName]

Facts only have value where uncovered, developed, exposed, pursued and acted upon.

And that process sure as hell IS partisan even if the underlying facts are not.

Says the worm king, himself.

 

[Tsing Tao]

Frankly you've shown your card multiple times with the same bet in the past. The fact is I rustle your jimmies something fierce and want to "censor" dissenting voices because you want a safe space.

You keep calling these things "facts", when they're just your opinions on how the world works, which is of course, different than reality. For example, you claim "the fact that you 'rustle my jimmies'" as if this is proven fact. I've told you before, my friend. You don't bother me in the slightest. It wasn't me who put you on ignore originally because I kept getting stomped. It was the other way around. Just because someone disagrees with you doesn't mean they are triggered.

I don't want to censor any dissenting voices. The only characters on this forum I've ever argued for banning are the ones with multiple aliases. And even those, only when they were repeating and/or continued violations.

This is not censoring, it is called following the rules. Crying about censoring is like when folks go to the feedback section and cry "racist".

Or like this guy who calls for the mods all the time and then calls people a pussy when they call for the mods. Not that I'd expect anything less than hypocrisy from that tool.

 

[Tsing Tao]

All roads lead back to Skinny Joe from Philadelphia with you.

That's all you've got? One article, one time? And this is mass, national propaganda pushing by me?

If I went back to find all the posts on the dossier we were going to get all the dirt on....or the second dossier we were supposedly going to get about Trump....er...oh wait, that wasn't me.

No. This is new.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/jan/30/trump-russia-collusion-fbi-cody-shearer-memo

 

[Tsing Tao]

Facts only have value where uncovered, developed, exposed, pursued and acted upon.

And that process sure as hell IS partisan even if the underlying facts are not.

Excellent point. And the fact that UsualName disliked it further proves my point that it is an excellent point.

 

[UsualName]

That's all you've got? One article, one time? And this is mass, national propaganda pushing by me?

If I went back to find all the posts on the dossier we were going to get all the dirt on....or the second dossier we were supposedly going to get about Trump....er...oh wait, that wasn't me.

It was new! That’s what you got on me? 3 years ago, I posted about the possibility of a second dossier? Keep digging, the world needs ditch diggers. Lol.

Meanwhile you have a whole thread about mathematical smoothing conspiracy theory and an ongoing dialogue about doctors inflating Covid deaths.

Heal thyself, Skinny Joe!

 

[Tsing Tao]

It was new! That’s what you got on me? 3 years ago, I posted about the possibility of a second dossier? Keep digging, the world needs ditch diggers. Lol.

Ah, when do the statute of limitations expire on posting bullshit? I'm not familiar with the UsualName Code of Convenience Statutes to Pull Out of One's Ass to Make a Point. So when you post something that you state belief in, it is a "possibility".

Meanwhile you have a whole thread about mathematical smoothing conspiracy theory and an ongoing dialogue about doctors inflating Covid deaths.

That isn't what I said at all. What I said was doctors and medical centers were financially incentivized to mark patients as COVID, respirator use, and to mark deaths as COVID positive. And I proved it with the CARES act. I then said it would not be difficult to draw a conclusion that these numbers were being fudged to gain financial incentives, as medicare fraud is also quite common.

You discounted this without evidence showing all data is audited and there was no way they could fraudulently claim such. I showed you were CDC requirements said cases only needed to be "suspected positive" to further show how foul play could occur.

When I post something that is a possibility, it means I am saying it is definitely occurring. But when you post something, it only means it is a possibility. Because it was 3 years ago. Or something.

Double standard much? What am I saying, it's you! Of course you do.