Make yourself a logic tree that starts a one node.
Name the node "finite math".
Choose a link that leads to the next node.
Name the node Bollean Algebra. Make a mental note about all the other nodes on this plane: they have differing algabras according to the numeric base chosen. when you when toschool in the first form you learned a little bit of the algebra for base 10. Today you do not know for whom it is named.
From this node follow a link to the nodes on the meausures plane. Not oft chosen is the node named binary vector.
At this point, you cross through an invisible plane where theory becomes more pragmatic and just focuses in the volumetric container called "making money".
Most people cannot get into this container since they do not know its dimensions or construct.
To take all of the market's offer, you have to play in this container. This is not the fees and profit sharing world, the 2 and 20 world.
As you say, you are mixed up in how to use the first three nodes and their respective links.
I am polling the haves abd have not with respect to the container. I have two comments from 23 observers of the ontainer. This less than 5% sample has zero users.
I add myself to the group and of 24 and there is only 1 subscriber and profiteer. Yesterday Buy 1 Sell 2 suggested he could not understand how 2 pts a day puts the smallest possible trader into the !% of earners in the world's wealth categories. He cannot get into the container either, apparently.
In the container, their are 17 pathways from exit to exit. 7 happen very quickly and they fall into two groups: one where the vector changes and one where the vector doe not change. In the other group of 10, always the vector changes.
Step into the container to observe me operating there.
Follow me along one of the RDBMS dimensions. This dimension defines a trend in terms of events. There are three interdependent streams of different kinds of events. Today in the financial industry the glossary term for this is "contextual nature of the market". You will notice how differnet contexts get names but no one ever expresses how one context flows into another. When does the thing they named "chop" change to another named thing? Solution: get a new vocabulary and learn what the names of the real events are.
Another dimension is the measurement dimension. If things are not measured in the proper priority, a person gets the incorrect answer.
The last dimension is the "WAIT" dimension. It was given a name in the Cash Cow logic of years past.
What is happening in the container is 5 streans of consideration; they are all interrelated with full specificity.
All of this has been posted or tranferred to others for over 50 years.
You are explaining that you do not "get it". Why?
QED.
