Quote from 88888accountant:
okay, I dont get it. Please condence.
It is not possible to know the future of a stock because the market is quantized, thus any action you take changes the outcome.
As far as trading = gambling. I find this stupid. Any argument that says that trading is gambling is also an argument that everything is gambling, thus debasing the english language.
Anyway, your thread seems fairly interesting. I just simply dont get it, and im am far too curious about other things to waste time (too much time, I'll explore any idea a little) on cryptic messages.
if you truley want to help, explain it straight up or use a socratic method.
Just my thoughts. Sorry about the tonality of the post, but I just read through everything and understand nothing so it seems to be a waste of my time, and I just cant justify spending more time on something so cryptic.
p.s. Julius Ceasar was never emperor of rome.
8s
Julius Ceasar is long dead and gone, and whatever he did, or did not accomplish, will have no effect on our trading results !
If you think that trading is not gambling, then you are wrong :eek:
The English language contains tons of rubbish words, such as right, wrong, maybe, if and when, to name but a few !
To anticipate what is possible at a future date in time, one must be aware of several KEY facts about the distant past, the near distant past and the immediate past !
These facts are then arranged in a logical and geometrical framework to enhance the accuracy of the anticipated future event, its time and duration.
As this framework can not be 100% accurate each and every time, then the outcome is probable.
Any probable outcome, may or may not happen.
If we place a bet on something that may, or may not happen, we are gambling, no matter how much we try and convince ourselves otherwise.
If we know that we are going to gamble, then it is logical to deduce that the odds will be greatly on our side if we play like the casino owner, as opposed to the casino punter
Must go, busy day ahead.