The lunacy of the Darwinists

Maybe because they know I don't need any help in dealing with the goose step talking points of the right wingers, maybe because the left wingers are independent thinkers, maybe because they are not ditto heads.....maybe because they agree with the points I am making....maybe because they know I won't be shouted down...

What we do see is that right wingers are clannish, left wingers are not....

However, who knows why people post or not post, and who really cares?

Quote from traderNik:

btw, Z...have you ever noticed that the most prominent proponents of arguments from the left here at ET suddenly disappear whenever you post one of your anti-right rants?

Now why do you think that is?
More...
 
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:
Maybe because they know I don't need any help in dealing with the goose step talking points of the right wingers, maybe because the left wingers are independent thinkers, maybe because they are not ditto heads.....maybe because they agree with the points I am making....maybe because they know I won't be shouted down...

What we do see is that right wingers are clannish, left wingers are not....

However, who knows why people post or not post, and who really cares?
More...
lol...everything fits in your little fantasy world, doesn't it? So those on the left routinely help each other out on other threads where arguments from the right are made, but whenever you post, they all disappear.

Ummm... yes, ok. That makes sense... errrr...

And btw.. this is the second reference you have made to goose stepping and Nazis. Of course coming from you, this is simply a matter of bad taste and not something more sinister, since intellectual cowards like you would never slink out from behind the protection of the computer long enough to act out any of the hate-based posturing you indulge in. How easy it is for you to hide and use the phrase 'goose stepping'. What an insult to anyone who has been the victim of fascism. It is not at all ironic that we see this from you, someone who typifies the kind of weak-mindedness which is the ideal precondition for dogmatism.
 
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

Maybe because they know I don't need any help in dealing with the goose step talking points of the right wingers
More...

Would accusing someone of being a Nazi constitute a TOU violation?
 
"It is not at all ironic that we see this from you"

The we collective speaks....

ROTFLMAO....



Quote from traderNik:

lol...everything fits in your little fantasy world, doesn't it? So those on the left routinely help each other out on other threads where arguments from the right are made, but whenever you post, they all disappear.

Ummm... yes, ok. That makes sense... errrr...

And btw.. this is the second reference you have made to goose stepping and Nazis. Of course coming from you, this is simply a matter of bad taste and not something more sinister, since intellectual cowards like you would never slink out from behind the protection of the computer long enough to act out any of the hate-based posturing you indulge in. How easy it is for you to hide and use the phrase 'goose stepping'. What an insult to anyone who has been the victim of fascism. It is not at all ironic that we see this from you, someone who typifies the kind of weak-mindedness which is the ideal precondition for dogmatism.
More...
 
Which particular ET member was accused of being a Nazi?

For the hard of thinking:

From Mirriam-Webster:

goose-step
One entry found for goose-step.
Main Entry: goose-step
Pronunciation: 'güs-"step
Function: intransitive verb
1 : to march in a goose step
2 : to practice an unthinking conformity


Quote from traderNik:

Would accusing someone of being a Nazi constitute a TOU violation?
More...
 
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

Which particular ET member was accused of being a Nazi?
More...

Who were you referring to when you used the phrase 'goose stepping'?

Which instance of your use of that phrase am I talking about?

Oh, I don't know... pick one.
 
Quote from traderNik:

Ahhh... but I'm not talking about the mods, who probably view your obsessive posting as a good thing, since page views are what this site thrives on. Sorry to tell you this, Z, but the mods aren't here to judge the content of your posts. They are here to make sure that TOU violations don't occur. Do you see the difference? Surely even you can understand it.

You see, Z, there are good arguments to be made from your side of the argument. The problem is, you can't make them. Any group of intellectually honest ID'ers would judge your posts to be misleading and informed by superstition. They would censure your refusal to respond to challenges to your assertions. They would point out the lies like the one you told about the phrase 'like taking candy from a baby' and would conclude that your aim is not to further the debate but to rub your own G-spot.

If there were an ET Supreme Court that ruled on ethical violations, you would have been banned from this site long ago, since you willfully engage in deceit and non-responsiveness as a dialectical method.

All your threads are...Closed.
More...

Don't try to reason with him. It just eggs him on. Better to simply talk around him, when he gets to where he is now, i.e., at the point where he's got nothing left except a personal attack intended to obfuscate the original premise of the thread and drive everyone away.

Bottom line is that his premise that Darwinism is lunacy is crap. If anything he's proved that his own beliefs are lunacy and Darwinism seems pretty sane by comparison.
 
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

Which particular ET member was accused of being a Nazi?

For the hard of thinking:

From Mirriam-Webster:

goose-step
One entry found for goose-step.
Main Entry: goose-step
Pronunciation: 'güs-"step
Function: intransitive verb
1 : to march in a goose step
2 : to practice an unthinking conformity
More...

Oh, ok... so the phrase 'goose stepping' isn't associated with the Nazis?

lol... Z, this whole weekend has been a sub-par performance by you. Even yesterday you were not on form.
 
Quote from kjkent1:

Don't try to reason with him. It just eggs him on. Better to simply talk around him, when he gets to where he is now, i.e., at the point where he's got nothing left except a personal attack intended to obfuscate the original premise of the thread and drive everyone away.

Bottom line is that his premise that Darwinism is lunacy is crap. If anything he's proved that his own beliefs are lunacy and Darwinism seems pretty sane by comparison.
More...

Yes, I notice that in this thread, he has degenerated much more quickly than in the last one. What page are we on here, 30?

As I mentioned, this whole weekend has been sub-par from him. It's almost sad when you see someone who was destined to crash and burn actually going down.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top