The lunacy of the Darwinists

A dogmatic view of the world?

<img src=http://kenji.cnu.ac.kr/peanuts/strips/s01/dogmatic.gif>

Quote from Ricter:

Relative to the kids... Lmao, spoken like a good relativistic thinker.

But anyway, is a worldview dogmatic if it has as a crucial part of its method a mechanism to review and update itself?
 
Quote from stu:

You write the reference, then you say I have the reading comprehension problem.
So jem the item between us in this thread now , ... .isn't evolution a fact ?

STU you have serious issues.

We had no issue on this subject. I refused to engage in debate with you. Precisely because of things like this. You now cut and paste my stamens to create a false context.

You need to get over your irrational fear of people who believe in God.
 
A dogmatic view of the world?

I was wondering when your habitual evasion would begin.

So, is a worldview dogmatic if it... oh, nm.

Is it time for you to call the question a name?
 
<img src=http://jacobsmedia.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/man_hamster_wheel_lg_nwm.gif>

stu, is that you trying to score a chitchat point?
:D
 
Is expecting answers to stupid rhetorical questions an indicator of stupidity?

Quote from Ricter:

I was wondering when your habitual evasion would begin.

So, is a worldview dogmatic if it... oh, nm.

Is it time for you to call the question a name?
 
Quote from nononsense:

Wrong.
Power is the time derivative of Energy.
To simple minded people you could perhaps say:
"Power is merely the release of Energy",
but don't quote nononsense on this. :)

An educated person would instantly recognize what I meant, and would not require an extended discussion about the possibly simple mindedness of my definition. So, to be clear, then:

Power is the rate of change of energy in a system over time.

Now, then, do you have a point, or did you just want to display your ass for me?
 
Quote from kjkent1:

An educated person would instantly recognize what I meant, and would not require an extended discussion about the possibly simple mindedness of my definition. So, to be clear, then:

Power is the rate of change of energy in a system over time.

Now, then, do you have a point, or did you just want to display your ass for me?
No, simply correct an obvious error.
"An educated person would" hate to rely on his readers to "instantly recognize" sloppy wording, or worse, incompetent posturing.

No "ass displaying" at all, simply trying to keep up minimum standards of rigor on chitchat.
Hope this helps a bit.
nononsense
:)
 
You are asking a dude to display his ass for you???

:eek: :eek: :eek:

Quote from kjkent1:

An educated person would instantly recognize what I meant, and would not require an extended discussion about the possibly simple mindedness of my definition. So, to be clear, then:

Power is the rate of change of energy in a system over time.

Now, then, do you have a point, or did you just want to display your ass for me?
 
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

You are asking a dude to display his ass for you???

:eek: :eek: :eek:

No, I asked whether or not that was his intent. Work on your reading comprehension.
 
Back
Top