I don't know how to define "small" and "large" objectively. I prefer to use "efficient". It sure looks to me that them liberal Swedes have figured out how to run a relatively efficient solvent government (using the tax burden/govt expenditure metric). Hence, my point about the clearly invalid assertion made by the author the original article.Quote from as678:
Solvent government is better than an insolvent one. A small solvent government is better than a large solvent government. It is an x - y spectrum. We're in the wrong corner: Large and insolvent.