The Left Also Supports Mumia Abu-Jamal

dbphoenix said:
Also the "hands" of those cops who've been so busy killing unarmed civilians.

I anticipated this some time ago. And posted such. The wingnuts wanted this. Now they have it. What are they going to do with it?
More...


So you agree that violence against the police was a foreseeable result of Obama, Sharpton, Holder and the other race hustlers trying to inflate routine police encounters into race-based abuses?

This really must hurt because a staple of liberals has been to try to censor conservatives by spuriously linking them to isolated acts of violence. Now we get a case where there is no need to speculate. We have the killer's own words that it was payback. And who gave him the idea that, contrary to two grand juries' decisions, the cops were guilty? Whose demonstrations feature mobs chanting death to the police?
 
AAAintheBeltway said:
So you agree that violence against the police was a foreseeable result of Obama, Sharpton, Holder and the other race hustlers trying to inflate routine police encounters into race-based abuses?
More...

It was a foreseeable result of providing cops with riot gear, assault weapons, and armored vehicles, giving them a pass on killing unarmed civilians, encouraging the public to buy guns for every man, woman, and child, open carry laws, etc, etc, etc.

Expecting the poor, the disabled, the elderly to just stand around (or sit around, if they are wheelchair-bound) and wait to be gunned down was/is unreasonable.

Enjoy.
 
Seriously. Don't fight with the cops and your chances of getting killed by them go to near zero.

No one is giving them a pass. The cases were presented to grand juries. I know you and Obama would have preferred show trials so you could whip up more racial discord, but we have a legal process. Or maybe you would just prefer a mob lynching?
 
AAAintheBeltway said:
Seriously. Don't fight with the cops and your chances of getting killed by them go to near zero.

No one is giving them a pass. The cases were presented to grand juries. I know you and Obama would have preferred show trials so you could whip up more racial discord, but we have a legal process. Or maybe you would just prefer a mob lynching?
More...

And how many have been charged?
 
dbphoenix said:
And how many have been charged?
More...

So you just want people charged regardless of whether they committed a crime, is that it? AAA's point is that they weren't "given a pass". They were tried and found innocent by a jury of their peers. That's how the justice system works.
 
Ricter said:
You seem to love the topic, especially I suspect the "in group" feeling you get from hating "those people".

But so long as we continue to catch racists "red handed" on hidden camera and post it to youtube, confirming to all that there is good reason to keep the card in the deck, it's not over, whether you're dead or not.
More...

Where is your evidence that Wilson shot Brown because he is racist?

Where is your evidence that Zimmerman shot Martin because he is racist?

It is time to put up or shut up.
 
wildchild said:
Where is your evidence that Wilson shot Brown because he is racist?

Where is your evidence that Zimmerman shot Martin because he is racist?

It is time to put up or shut up.
More...
The race card will be played so long as there is still racism. You alone can keep it alive, but you're not alone.
 
wildchild said:
Where is your evidence that Wilson shot Brown because he is racist?

Where is your evidence that Zimmerman shot Martin because he is racist?

It is time to put up or shut up.
More...
Liberals don't belive in evidence.

They believe whatever MSNBC tells them to believe. Facts be damned.
 
Ricter said:
The race card will be played so long as there is still racism. You alone can keep it alive, but you're not alone.
More...

By all means play it. How did that work out for you in the election?

BTW, weren't you tasked with presenting some evidence? As I said before, put up or shut up.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top