The latest Clinton cash intrigue involves a Czech model and a 'distasteful' $500,000 donation

So then, all you have is his temporarily blocking the chamber's push to renew parts of the Patriot Act? That's the sum and substance of it? Okay.

No, his voting record shows that he is willing to go against his party if the constitutional rights of Americans are in danger. He has repeatedly stood up to the Senate and tried to filibuster or pass legislation that secures privacy and equality. You posted his records proving it in your link from the paper in Iowa. This is the primary reason I - at this point - say he has my vote. This latest example of how Paul made the Patriot Act provision expire proves all that.

But I see you are still unwilling/unable to answer the question posed to you. I'll stop pestering you on it, as you've proven what I expected. You simply have no reason for supporting Hillary other than she's the leading democrat.
 
Did I ever say I was endorsing Trump? I don't think so. I said I thought he might be a better candidate than people are giving him credit for.

Certainly Trump would be far preferable to a corrupt, hard leftist like Hillary.


5440002785_390b7c22f1_m.jpg


Are you suggesting that Trump would be a good president and that he should run?
Yes on both scores...

http://www.elitetrader.com/et/index.php?threads/who-is-the-best-for-2016.289310/page-26#post-4128457
 
Last edited:
You're a smart guy. Usually wrong, but capable of better. So I'll give you a pass on your first comment.

And yet you're the one who can't back up your statement OR answer any question on Hillary's accomplishments. But I'm the one wrong. o_O


AAA, that certainly appears to be an endorsement of that idiot Trump. FF has got ya there.
 
Actual post:


Frederick Foresight said: Are you suggesting that Trump would be a good president and that he should run?
More...

Yes on both scores. Who has a better combination of actual accomplishments, street smarts, media saavy and celebrity status?

I'm sure there are plenty of issues I would disagree with him on. At least with him I don't think he would take positions because lobbyists were dictating them to him or that he was acting out some lifelong deep-seated hatred of our country.

****************

That is not an indorsement. I said I thought he would be a good president and he should run. That contrasts to my views of Dr. Ben Carson, who I doubt would be an effective president and who I think should not run, even though I greatly admire him.
 
Back
Top