The Israel Lobby

[dddooo]

Quote from kissanmakeup:

who is most? can you name your most?

I already posted earlier in the thread but for your convenience:

-The university stated that it reflects the views of its authors only...

-The study's many critics claim that its academic quality is poor..

-Well-known researchers such as Marvin Kalb, also of Harvard's Kennedy School, said this week that the study fails to meet minimal academic standards...

-Other academics - some of them not known as fans of AIPAC - also cited many professional flaws in the study, such as omitting relevant facts, relying on unofficial sources (including Haaretz), and leaping to conclusions that are not necessarily supported by the facts.

-Dennis Ross, who said the authors displayed "a woeful lack of knowledge on the subject."..."It is basically a series of assertions."


But what do I know, Harvard, academics, researchers, politicians, Clinton's appointees, they must all be part of the jewish consipracy. If they don't critique the study that proves they have nothing to say and the study is therefore correct, if they do critique it that also proves the study is correct and the critics are part of the very jewish lobby it is talking about. You just can't lose KissMyAssAndMakeUP.

Quote from kissanmakeup:

this thing is spreading.

So is The Protocols of the Elders of Zion - same sites, same people, same scientific background and justification, same supporters. Nothing new here. No big deal either. It's preaching to the converted, no wonder the only person who responded in this thread is ET's own british antisemite and muslim bitch Fred. People who are intelligent and open-minded easily understand the difference between true research and cheap political propaganda based on distortions, heresay and lies (even if published by people with academic credentials).

 

[dddooo]

Quote from kissanmakeup:

who is most? can you name your most?

BTW can you now name reputatable, knowledgeable and experienced individuals or organizations who do support the study and share its conclusions. David Duke, Hamas, PLO, Al-Jazeera, Osama (most likely). Can you add to this list? Or everybody else is part of the jewish conspiracy as I suspect you'll respond?

 

[kissanmakeup]

Quote from dddooo:

-The university stated that it reflects the views of its authors only...

-The study's many critics claim that its academic quality is poor..

-Well-known researchers such as Marvin Kalb, also of Harvard's Kennedy School, said this week that the study fails to meet minimal academic standards...

-Other academics - some of them not known as fans of AIPAC - also cited many professional flaws in the study, such as omitting relevant facts, relying on unofficial sources (including Haaretz), and leaping to conclusions that are not necessarily supported by the facts.

-Dennis Ross, who said the authors displayed "a woeful lack of knowledge on the subject."..."It is basically a series of assertions."

who are the other academics ddddoo? can you provide me with a list?

if we exclude the "other academics," until you provide proof to the contrary, are the two other men who you meant when you said "Most scientists and political experts disagree with their conclusions"

i know that your jewish masters handed you the above but you should be smarter than just dumping things in here without authenticating them.

So is The Protocols of the Elders of Zion - same sites, same people, same scientific background and justification, same supporters. Nothing new here. No big deal either. It's preaching to the converted, no wonder the only person who responded in this thread is ET's own british antisemite and muslim bitch Fred. People who are intelligent and open-minded easily understand the difference between true research and cheap political propaganda based on distortions, heresay and lies (even if published by people with academic credentials).

that is a shame ddddoo when your only line of defense is to attack anyone who opposes you by using these cheap tactics.

by the way, had you bothered to read the paper, you would,ve noticed that these two scholars even discussed that they are aware that you will use the same tactics you used above.

shame

 

[kissanmakeup]

Quote from dddooo:

BTW can you now name reputatable, knowledgeable and experienced individuals or organizations who do support the study and share its conclusions. David Duke, Hamas, PLO, Al-Jazeera, Osama (most likely). Can you add to this list? Or everybody else is part of the jewish conspiracy as I suspect you'll respond?

i am not the one who came in here and claimed that "Most scientists and political experts disagree with their conclusions, on the positive side the study was approved by David Duke and Hamas."

you did that to give your defunked argument some clout. everything these people wrote is right and you know it, that is why you acted the same exact way the jewish lobby in the u.s. acts, lie and discredit and assassinate the characters of the scholars behind such report.

aside from that, you did not discuss any of the facts in it because you know it is right.

 

[dddooo]

Quote from kissanmakeup:

your only line of defense is to attack anyone who opposes you by using these cheap tactics.

LOL, you mean something like this:

Quote from kissanmakeup:
that still does not mean that you did not intimidate harvard into pulling their endorsement.

Quote from kissanmakeup:
beware the might of the jewish lobby.

Quote from kissanmakeup:
dennis ross was more israeli than barak was.

PS The more you post the more I am convinced you're Wael.

 

[kissanmakeup]

Quote from dddooo:

PS The more you post the more I am convinced you're Wael.

i am wael! didn't you know?

 

[dddooo]

Quote from kissanmakeup:

i am not the one who came in here and claimed that "Most scientists and political experts disagree with their conclusions, on the positive side the study was approved by David Duke and Hamas."

Thank you, in other words two american antisemites with academic credentials published an op-ed hit piece overseas and there are no reputable reserachers, scientists, experts or politicians who agree with their conclusions. That's good enough for me, end of discussion.

 

[dddooo]

Quote from kissanmakeup:

i am wael! didn't you know?

I am glad you're back, you just helped me debunk yet another "jewish conspiracy" crap.

 

[kissanmakeup]

Quote from dddooo:

Thank you, in other words two american antisemites with academic credentials published an op-ed hit piece overseas and there are no reputable reserachers, scientists, experts or politicians who agree with their conclusions. That's fine with me, end of discussion.

i am busy right now. my argument is prove their argument wrong not that they have thick eyebrows and big ears.
read the paper and let us discuss it, how is that with you?
i hate when people go to their respective propaganda sites to retrieve whatever relates to whoever they want to discredit and then dump it.
again, i invite you to read the article and we will discuss it if you'd like, otherwise, you are wasting your time and mine.

 

[kissanmakeup]

Quote from dddooo:

I am glad you're back, you just helped me debunk yet another "jewish conspiracy" crap.

you are a paranoid man my friend.
i also got the sense that here you go on following the same exact jewish lobby strategy of discrediting your opponents