The Herd, Vaccine and Natural Immunity Thread....
- Thread starter jem
- Start date
Natural immunity DESTROYING vaxx priests …. Confirmed.
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.24.21262415v1.full.pdf
shocked that GWB is dead fucking wrong again.
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.24.21262415v1.full.pdf
shocked that GWB is dead fucking wrong again.
He/she is definitely wrong and this is virology 101.
CDC Counts Those who Die within 14 Days of a Covid Jab as Unvaccinated!
Mainstream media is frightening people into taking Covid vaccines by promoting a study by the CDC that claims that Los Angeles County residents who are unvaccinated are 5 times more likely to get Covid and are 29 times more likely to be hospitalized than those who took the jabs. However, the definition of ‘unvaccinated’ is deceptive. The study defines unvaccinated as having received a first-dose vaccine up to 14 days prior. That means, if someone was hospitalized, admitted to ICU, required mechanical ventilation or died within two weeks of getting the jab, they are counted as ‘unvaccinated.’ This intentionally misleading data is now being used as justification for vaccine mandates and passports nationwide. It also fraudulently lowers the number of deaths and injuries linked to the Covid vaccines. -GEG
https://needtoknow.news/2021/08/bom...ithin-14-days-of-a-covid-jab-as-unvaccinated/
Mainstream media is frightening people into taking Covid vaccines by promoting a study by the CDC that claims that Los Angeles County residents who are unvaccinated are 5 times more likely to get Covid and are 29 times more likely to be hospitalized than those who took the jabs. However, the definition of ‘unvaccinated’ is deceptive. The study defines unvaccinated as having received a first-dose vaccine up to 14 days prior. That means, if someone was hospitalized, admitted to ICU, required mechanical ventilation or died within two weeks of getting the jab, they are counted as ‘unvaccinated.’ This intentionally misleading data is now being used as justification for vaccine mandates and passports nationwide. It also fraudulently lowers the number of deaths and injuries linked to the Covid vaccines. -GEG
https://needtoknow.news/2021/08/bom...ithin-14-days-of-a-covid-jab-as-unvaccinated/
----
Study: One-third of Americans were infected with COVID by
--
December 2020
Study: One-third of Americans were infected with COVID by December 2020
Michael Gartland, New York Daily News 8 hrs ago
The study, which was conducted by researchers at Columbia University’s Mailman School of Public Health and published in the journal Nature on Thursday, reveals that 103 million Americans, or 31% of the population, had been infected by December 2020 — and that the rate of infection in New York City at the time was even higher at 44%.
The vast majority of infectious were not accounted for by the number of confirmed cases,” said Jeffrey Shaman, one of the report’s researchers and a professor of environmental health sciences at the Mailman School. “It is these undocumented cases, which are often mild or asymptomatic infectious, that allow the virus to spread quickly through the broader population.”
The study aimed to account for a lack of testing early in the pandemic and the fact that people with no or few symptoms were less likely to get tested.
Its findings, when paired with COVID-19 test results from the end of December 2020, reveal a stark divide.
While the study estimates that 31% of the overall U.S. population had been infected by December, the Centers for Disease Control put out statistics that same month showing only 12.3% of COVID-19 tests taken at the time were positive.
The peer-reviewed research found that by the end of 2020, infection rates were particularly high in several regions and in big cities, with 48% of people in Chicago infected, 52% of Los Angeles and 42% of Miami.
In parts of the Midwest like Minnesota, Wisconsin and Iowa, more than 60% of the population had been infected, the study found.
“While the landscape has changed with the availability of vaccines and the spread of new variants, it is important to recognize just how dangerous the pandemic was in its first year,” said Sen Pei, one of the researchers and an assistant professor at Mailman.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/medical/study-one-third-of-americans-were-infected-with-covid-by-december-2020/ar-AANMi4v?ocid=uxbndlbing
So as we surmised... far more people had been infected.
If you were to add in all the people whose antibodies waned... the reason why the curves were looking similar and then rolling over is that we were getting to herd immunity for the the people who were out and about were getting immunity..
Lockdowns were destroying the immunity we were reaching..
Fucking Idiots running the country. Even the moron in the end of that is ridiculous. If far more people were infected it shows the virus was far less dangerous and more like the flu.
Study: One-third of Americans were infected with COVID by
--
December 2020
Study: One-third of Americans were infected with COVID by December 2020
Michael Gartland, New York Daily News 8 hrs ago
The study, which was conducted by researchers at Columbia University’s Mailman School of Public Health and published in the journal Nature on Thursday, reveals that 103 million Americans, or 31% of the population, had been infected by December 2020 — and that the rate of infection in New York City at the time was even higher at 44%.
The vast majority of infectious were not accounted for by the number of confirmed cases,” said Jeffrey Shaman, one of the report’s researchers and a professor of environmental health sciences at the Mailman School. “It is these undocumented cases, which are often mild or asymptomatic infectious, that allow the virus to spread quickly through the broader population.”
The study aimed to account for a lack of testing early in the pandemic and the fact that people with no or few symptoms were less likely to get tested.
Its findings, when paired with COVID-19 test results from the end of December 2020, reveal a stark divide.
While the study estimates that 31% of the overall U.S. population had been infected by December, the Centers for Disease Control put out statistics that same month showing only 12.3% of COVID-19 tests taken at the time were positive.
The peer-reviewed research found that by the end of 2020, infection rates were particularly high in several regions and in big cities, with 48% of people in Chicago infected, 52% of Los Angeles and 42% of Miami.
In parts of the Midwest like Minnesota, Wisconsin and Iowa, more than 60% of the population had been infected, the study found.
“While the landscape has changed with the availability of vaccines and the spread of new variants, it is important to recognize just how dangerous the pandemic was in its first year,” said Sen Pei, one of the researchers and an assistant professor at Mailman.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/medical/study-one-third-of-americans-were-infected-with-covid-by-december-2020/ar-AANMi4v?ocid=uxbndlbing
So as we surmised... far more people had been infected.
If you were to add in all the people whose antibodies waned... the reason why the curves were looking similar and then rolling over is that we were getting to herd immunity for the the people who were out and about were getting immunity..
Lockdowns were destroying the immunity we were reaching..
Fucking Idiots running the country. Even the moron in the end of that is ridiculous. If far more people were infected it shows the virus was far less dangerous and more like the flu.
Attachments
..
https://www.americanthinker.com/art...l_a_baitandswitch_on_the_american_people.html
"What the FDA approved and licensed is Pfizer’s Comirnaty Covid vaccine not the current Pfizer-BioNTech Covid vaccine in use under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA). The FDA has acknowledged that Pfizer has insufficient stocks of the newly licensed Comirnaty vaccine available but there is a significant amount of the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid vaccine available under the EUA still on hand."
What that means is that you cannot mandate BioNTech to federal employees because it is not FDA approved. It can be mandated legally for the military.
"What the FDA approved and licensed is Pfizer’s Comirnaty Covid vaccine not the current Pfizer-BioNTech Covid vaccine in use under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA). The FDA has acknowledged that Pfizer has insufficient stocks of the newly licensed Comirnaty vaccine available but there is a significant amount of the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid vaccine available under the EUA still on hand."
What that means is that you cannot mandate BioNTech to federal employees because it is not FDA approved. It can be mandated legally for the military.
Last edited:
It should be noted... a strong natural immune systems will not likely produce long lasting antibodies. Persistent antibodies are associated with high risk co morbidities and disease severity.
If you are healthy you may not have needed persistent antibodies.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanmic/article/PIIS2666-5247(21)00025-2/fulltext
We observed a distinct stepwise progression from the negative group to the persistent group, whereby patients with persistent antibodies were older and had more comorbidities, including hypertension and diabetes mellitus.
The demographic differences we observed were probably related to increased disease severity, as patients in the persistent group had poorer clinical outcomes, including pneumonia, supplemental oxygen requirement, intensive care unit admission, and mechanical ventilation. Baseline symptoms and investigations reflected this increased disease severity, with a greater proportion of patients with fever, cough, dyspnoea, reduced lymphocyte count, increased C-reactive protein, and increased lactate dehydrogenase in the persistent group. We observed a greater proportion of asymptomatic individuals in the negative group (11 [58%] of 19 patients) compared with the persistent group (three [6%] of 52 patients).
Viral load data, in the form of quantitative PCR results, were available for 70 patients and, in this subgroup, baseline earliest nasopharyngeal PCR cycle threshold values on admission were not associated with antibody response (data not shown), although there are limitations to this data as sample types varied (eg, nasopharyngeal swab, oropharyngeal swab, or sputum).
In the multivariable model that incorporated age, sex, and presence of comorbidities, only disease severity was independently associated with persistent antibody levels, with an adjusted odds ratio of 5·20 (95% CI 1·83–16·7) for moderate disease severity and 30·3 (10·0–107·9) for severe disease severity, both compared with patients with mild disease (table 2).
If you are healthy you may not have needed persistent antibodies.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanmic/article/PIIS2666-5247(21)00025-2/fulltext
We observed a distinct stepwise progression from the negative group to the persistent group, whereby patients with persistent antibodies were older and had more comorbidities, including hypertension and diabetes mellitus.
The demographic differences we observed were probably related to increased disease severity, as patients in the persistent group had poorer clinical outcomes, including pneumonia, supplemental oxygen requirement, intensive care unit admission, and mechanical ventilation. Baseline symptoms and investigations reflected this increased disease severity, with a greater proportion of patients with fever, cough, dyspnoea, reduced lymphocyte count, increased C-reactive protein, and increased lactate dehydrogenase in the persistent group. We observed a greater proportion of asymptomatic individuals in the negative group (11 [58%] of 19 patients) compared with the persistent group (three [6%] of 52 patients).
Viral load data, in the form of quantitative PCR results, were available for 70 patients and, in this subgroup, baseline earliest nasopharyngeal PCR cycle threshold values on admission were not associated with antibody response (data not shown), although there are limitations to this data as sample types varied (eg, nasopharyngeal swab, oropharyngeal swab, or sputum).
In the multivariable model that incorporated age, sex, and presence of comorbidities, only disease severity was independently associated with persistent antibody levels, with an adjusted odds ratio of 5·20 (95% CI 1·83–16·7) for moderate disease severity and 30·3 (10·0–107·9) for severe disease severity, both compared with patients with mild disease (table 2).
You are a moron...that is the lancet study you cited...thinking persistent antibodies were the only thing that protects you...the science moron you are.