So I finally got around to looking into these and will share some thoughts on why I think every single one of them would have been a bad signal to follow from the "obvious" side.
(for note, my timezone is Pacific time, which is a -8h delta from you)
In the above video, you see a large "seller" chasing an offer down and consider this as a sign to go short.
The problem is, that seller probably knows that and is leading the sheep to the slaughter. The large order is pushing price down as people front-run it while those in the know are having their buy order liquidity filled. Even if that 200 lot offer was filled, they may still be net long afterward (consider how many people hit the bid on seeing that 350 lot and who knows, maybe they're +300 long by then). In the last candle, the invisible hand (and probably others) help to push price up into the stop zone igniting a serious breakout via cascading buy stops and chasers.
In the above video, you see a large "buyer" wipe out the offers and leave a 750 lot on the bid and consider this as a sign to go long.
One still would have had a shitty entry by following that signal and in reality it may have simply been someone covering their shorts from the large run down. Price consolidates afterward and drops again. Whether the 1000 lot buyer had any idea or not is of no consequence, buying would have gotten you nowhere good.
In the above video you see a large "seller" chasing the price down - seemingly worried about getting out ASAP (you described it as a "large mess" for somebody). This implies price is going to be dropping quickly and someone wants out now.
Part of it gets filled (200 lot or so), and everyone who took that as a sell signal got completely screwed (by design). This is basically the same situation as the first video: induce fear, get liquidity filled on the buy side in the process, rip the price up and profit.
Consider that getting multiple 100s of lots filled may even have more power than straight up spoofing because other traders saw it - they now believe that order (and intent) is/was real whereas it's easy to spot spoofing and use it as a reverse signal. It may even be possible that other traders "in the know" with similar size used those large orders against the original trader, but I kind of doubt that. Consider too that if these signals were valid then why didn't buyers or sellers yank their orders on the opposing side quickly? Who knows, but you don't have to get caught up in this mess by following bogus signals and helping to provide liquidity to these entities.
What's the consistent picture here? What you see isn't always as it appears and most obvious signals are a trap by design. They're not going to show their hand unless it's an extreme event - and if it is they'll just go market and be done.