ok, you do it your way, I'll do it my way. Calm uses very tight stops, tighter than what I would be comfortable with. All I'm saying is when you are getting stopped out all the time, which he is, the very worst thing you can do is widen the stops. Better to tighten them up, since you are probably going to get stopped out anyway.Quote from riffrafffpatrol:
oldtime-- think about what you are saying. If "probably' is truly the scenario in the potential trade relative to being stopped out... then you shouldn't be taking the trade in the first place. I'm not trying to argue with you or be difficult... I'm just trying to reason with you.
Sit on your hands until the best of the best setups present itself. This means the probabilities of getting stopped out should be lower... not higher. I have no problem entering in a trade with a "tight stop" if the probabilities indicate the likelihood of price going for you vs against you is high.
But you do NOT want to have the mentality that you will probably get stopped out. You DO however want to realize that regardless of the probabilites, uncertainty exists in every trade. This is necessary so if you do get stopped out, there is not mental anguish that follows. If there is you are admitting you didn't truly accept the risk of the trade in the first place.
As for the mechanics of a stop-- you do want to make sure that the normal volatility of the instrument is taken into consideration. Widening a stop could be necessary if one is getting stopped out often due to a conflict with the volatility relative to the room you are giving a trade to work.