Disclaimer: if you don’t want to get any dumber, stop reading now
Most of the times I’m a lurker trying to make a funny comment, but one sometimes one needs to go out and speak your thoughts and be critisized: I’m going to allocate a significant amount of money in this idea (or brainfart). I also need to provide entertainment to the smarter people to give them the incentive to stay here. Win-win, so to speak
So once in a while you read someting and decide to allocate more money to a particular idea because it speaks to you, or makes more sense than other ideas (and you like losing money). I s*ck extremely in short term directional trading, but with the macro themes I have done a little bit better in the past. It is basically based on "looking around" and try to get a sense of macro-/political factors and possible upcoming themes. For me it is mostly based on taking a quick look at ft.com (titles only) and as months and years pass, you think you can see some upcoming patterns. This time it was with possible upcomming cyber defense due to modern ways of warfare, not just economical, but also possible attacks on the “internet-structure” so to speak. And global tensions seem to pick up.
Then a few weeks later- or about the same time, @vanzandt starts to say the same things. To summarize, my rationale to go into PANW looks like:
- own gutfeel this could be a sector which is going to be more in demand then others
- @ vanzandt says so
- Pelosi says so (albeit bought unluckily a few days before the drop)
- PANW held up pretty well during the selloff
Another summary would be: this is the worst analysis I've ever read to base ones decision on
If you’re still reading, read on. It will get worser.
Here is the "chart". Now you see: “That’s a squiggly line b*tch!”
The lines are just a quick reference for a future expected price path. The lines “work”, you can easily see that because every stock ever issued is always moving in one simple channel since it’s inception
. And so, PANW will listen and move up soon. Just logical thinking.
This will be a longer term swing trade, minimum 6 months. More of an allocation of capital. The core position are quarterly/yearly call options with sometimes/fraction of the core position shorter term call options sold.
Most of the times I’m a lurker trying to make a funny comment, but one sometimes one needs to go out and speak your thoughts and be critisized: I’m going to allocate a significant amount of money in this idea (or brainfart). I also need to provide entertainment to the smarter people to give them the incentive to stay here. Win-win, so to speak
So once in a while you read someting and decide to allocate more money to a particular idea because it speaks to you, or makes more sense than other ideas (and you like losing money). I s*ck extremely in short term directional trading, but with the macro themes I have done a little bit better in the past. It is basically based on "looking around" and try to get a sense of macro-/political factors and possible upcoming themes. For me it is mostly based on taking a quick look at ft.com (titles only) and as months and years pass, you think you can see some upcoming patterns. This time it was with possible upcomming cyber defense due to modern ways of warfare, not just economical, but also possible attacks on the “internet-structure” so to speak. And global tensions seem to pick up.
Then a few weeks later- or about the same time, @vanzandt starts to say the same things. To summarize, my rationale to go into PANW looks like:
- own gutfeel this could be a sector which is going to be more in demand then others
- @ vanzandt says so
- Pelosi says so (albeit bought unluckily a few days before the drop)
- PANW held up pretty well during the selloff
Another summary would be: this is the worst analysis I've ever read to base ones decision on

If you’re still reading, read on. It will get worser.
Here is the "chart". Now you see: “That’s a squiggly line b*tch!”
The lines are just a quick reference for a future expected price path. The lines “work”, you can easily see that because every stock ever issued is always moving in one simple channel since it’s inception
This will be a longer term swing trade, minimum 6 months. More of an allocation of capital. The core position are quarterly/yearly call options with sometimes/fraction of the core position shorter term call options sold.
Last edited:
