The Great Global Warming Swindle

Quote from pspr:

Speaking of blabbering fools.... If you had a clue how CO2 worked as a greenhouse gas you would realize we are long past any additional greenhouse effect from CO2.

But, like Rectum, you are just an AGW layman. If you knew anything at all you would realize this summer is the last hurrah for the AGW Alarmists. Any new warming peak should have already occurred but instead it is colder. In just a couple more years you will see the reality of what is happening and you will fade from the sunset until you get yourself a new username as your futurecunt username will be the laughing stock here. (actually it already is)


Yeah, ok, sure. CO2 has suddenly stopped being a greenhouse gas. Time for your meds.
 
Quote from futurecurrents:

Yeah, ok, sure. CO2 has suddenly stopped being a greenhouse gas. Time for your meds.
You are just not very bright. Face it.

Here's a simple explanation for your feeble mind.

http://tucsoncitizen.com/wryheat/2011/02/23/carbon-dioxide-and-the-greenhouse-effect/

And here is a little gem that shows how ignorant Rectum is as he talks about CO2 and Venus:

Venus has a surface temperature of about 900 F and an atmosphere composed of 96% carbon dioxide. The temperature is the same from equator to poles, from day to night (Venus rotates on its axis in 2,802 hours rather than 24 hours). Venus is often touted as the extreme example of run-away greenhouse warming. But, there is almost no greenhouse warming on Venus because little, if any, direct sunlight gets to the surface. The atmosphere is too thick. In 1975, the Russian Venus lander Venera 9 measured clouds that were 30–40 km thick with bases at 30–35 km altitude. The surface air pressure on Venus is about 92 times greater than that on Earth. The high pressure alone can explain most of the high surface temperature. Although Venus gets almost twice the solar irradiation of Earth, Venus’ high albedo reflects back 65% of the sunlight.

Venus has almost no water vapor in the atmosphere (about 0.002%), and therefore lacks the major greenhouse gas that Earth has.
 
Quote from pspr:

You are just not very bright. Face it.

Here's a simple explanation for your feeble mind.

http://tucsoncitizen.com/wryheat/2011/02/23/carbon-dioxide-and-the-greenhouse-effect/

And here is a little gem that shows how ignorant Rectum is as he talks about CO2 and Venus:

Venus has a surface temperature of about 900 F and an atmosphere composed of 96% carbon dioxide. The temperature is the same from equator to poles, from day to night (Venus rotates on its axis in 2,802 hours rather than 24 hours). Venus is often touted as the extreme example of run-away greenhouse warming. But, there is almost no greenhouse warming on Venus because little, if any, direct sunlight gets to the surface. The atmosphere is too thick. In 1975, the Russian Venus lander Venera 9 measured clouds that were 30–40 km thick with bases at 30–35 km altitude. The surface air pressure on Venus is about 92 times greater than that on Earth. The high pressure alone can explain most of the high surface temperature. Although Venus gets almost twice the solar irradiation of Earth, Venus’ high albedo reflects back 65% of the sunlight.

Venus has almost no water vapor in the atmosphere (about 0.002%), and therefore lacks the major greenhouse gas that Earth has.

So in your psychotic mind CO2 is not a greenhouse gas anymore. I understand.
 
Quote from futurecurrents:

So in your psychotic mind CO2 is not a greenhouse gas anymore. I understand.
That must mean you don't know how to read, let alone understand basic science. Understandable for a turd like yourself.
 
Quote from futurecurrents:

And yet he displays logic and knowledge far beyond your feeble, deranged bleetings. So what does that make you?
Lol, look at his helpless rage on display!
 
Quote from Ricter:

Lol, look at his helpless rage on display!

He's pretty good with the Ad hominem attacks, not so much with peer-reviewed science. I guess he's trying to make up for the lack of any science or good argument supporting his position.
 
Quote from Ricter:

Lol, look at his helpless rage on display!

Impotent rage...or rage at being impotent is something I had not considered. Ricter, that explains a lot!
 
Well, we have all three ET monkeys opining with personal attacks instead of presenting any evidence for their belief in AGW. I think the debate is over guys. You have no facts that work and the observed facts don't support anything you have to say on the subject.

Capitulation at it finest but thanks for playing. Next time consider if you are on the right side of an argument before posting such stupid dribble.

There's 18" of snow in Denver and it's just 20 degrees. Are you monkeys up for a snowball fight?
 
Quote from pspr:

Well, we have all three ET monkeys opining with personal attacks instead of presenting any evidence for their belief in AGW. I think the debate is over guys. You have no facts that work and the observed facts don't support anything you have to say on the subject.

Capitulation at it finest but thanks for playing. Next time consider if you are on the right side of an argument before posting such stupid dribble.

There's 18" of snow in Denver and it's just 20 degrees. Are you monkeys up for a snowball fight?

Declaring yourself the winner does not mean you won. :D
 
Back
Top