The Great Global Warming Swindle

Quote from pspr:

Yes, you should get your politics out of the AGW debate and recognize the fallacy and politicizing of it.

No warming!!!

<img src=http://stevengoddard.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/screenhunter_157-apr-26-06-02.jpg?w=400&h=328>

Well now it's proved beyond a shadow of a doubt....

You're a fucking lying piece of shit, incredibly stupid, or insane. I'm going with all three.
 
Quote from futurecurrents:

.....It is the mark of a feeble argument and a dull mind that has to use insults and shrill words.......
Quote from futurecurrents:

Well now it's proved beyond a shadow of a doubt....

You're a fucking lying piece of shit, incredibly stupid, or insane. I'm going with all three.

<font size=3><b>Your own words indict you. You lose --- again.</font></b> :D :D :D
 
Quote from futurecurrents:

Well now it's proved beyond a shadow of a doubt....

You're a fucking lying piece of shit, incredibly stupid, or insane. I'm going with all three.
Maybe he's just trolling.
 
I have multiple reasons to know San Diego Bay was polluted.

Yes.... I have beaten experts with their own data on cross examination. And I have watched other attorneys do it.

any logical person can come up to speed on issues that require specialized knowledge. (if they put in the time)

I remember there were a couple of lawyers in the gore bush trial whom were very well versed when they were crossing experts. I felt one lawyer absolutely knew more than the expert.

(perhaps some esoteric fields are out of reach for even very smart people, but understanding that no study one has demonstrated a cause and effect relationship between and increase and CO2 and global temperatures... is a no brainer. As you know the data shows just the opposite temperature leads CO@.)








top one hundred lawyers in the U



Quote from Ricter:

And you can, with data provided by... scientists? Or in your case, scientist.

Edit: or in your case, your own eyes.
 
Quote from Ricter:

Maybe he's just trolling.

It is hard to believe someone could be so naturally stupid and douchey. So maybe he IS just trolling for views.

Or he is simply insane. The way he illogically rants is symptomatic.

jem is another one. Insane. There is no other way to explain the delusional thinking and selective ignorance.
 
Quote from jem:

I have multiple reasons to know San Diego Bay was polluted.

Yes.... I have beaten experts with their own data on cross examination. And I have watched other attorneys do it.

any logical person can come up to speed on issues that require specialized knowledge. (if they put in the time)

I remember there were a couple of lawyers in the gore bush trial whom were very well versed when they were crossing experts. I felt one lawyer absolutely knew more than the expert.

(perhaps some esoteric fields are out of reach for even very smart people, but understanding that no study one has demonstrated a cause and effect relationship between and increase and CO2 and global temperatures... is a no brainer. As you know the data shows just the opposite temperature leads CO@.)

top one hundred lawyers in the U
You're political views force you into contradictory corners. Like the scientist you mentioned for his statement (which you selectively edited) regarding warming. You left out the parts you disagree with. He's "right" on the parts you like, but a "clown" on the parts you don't like. You suit yourself, nothing more.

As for warming leading CO2 emissions, you're only half right.
 
Quote from Lucrum:

futurecunts isn't very bright.
That's the understatement of the year.

Reading posts from Futurecunt and Rectum are like watching Beavis and Butthead.
 
Quote from pspr:

That's the understatement of the year.

Reading posts from Futurecunt and Rectum are like watching Beavis and Butthead.


Stop insulting Beavis and Butthead...... they are two of the brightest guys on MTV.


:)
 
My political views, economic views and environmental views and moral views are aligned.
We should be conserving our country our budget and our environment for future generations.

I was once a lead plaintiff attorney in a Federal clean water lawsuit.

This agw nutter stuff is poltical it is not based on science.
If you said we should cut back on CO2 cause we do not really know... I would agree with you.

I just have a problem with the bullshit and the power and money grabs.

---


1. I posted the quote from the UN chief (who I am not really sure is a scientist) which was the only thing supported by data. The world has not been warming for 17 years.






Quote from Ricter:

You're political views force you into contradictory corners. Like the scientist you mentioned for his statement (which you selectively edited) regarding warming. You left out the parts you disagree with. He's "right" on the parts you like, but a "clown" on the parts you don't like. You suit yourself, nothing more.

As for warming leading CO2 emissions, you're only half right.
 
Back
Top