Actually, I don't typically alter what's inside the quote lines. I would rather have copied your text, pasted it outside, and added the word. But, too late to change it.Quote from gwb-trading:
I only hit the complain button for obvious commercial spam. I would hope that you have the ability to self moderate yourself to not violate the normal etiquette in a public forum.
Quote from futurecurrents:
Of course it became a driver. It's a greenhouse gas. And notice the dip? It perfectly precedes a dip in the temps. If temps were leading CO2 the opposite would occur.
Just like today. The CO2 has rocketed up from man and so the temps are also rising.
Quote from pspr:
One thing is for sure:
ÂOther factors than CO2 easily overrules any forcing from CO2. Only this way can the situations with high CO2 lead to falling temperatures.Â
This is essential, because, the whole idea of placing CO2 in a central role for driving temperatures was: ÂWe cannot explain the big changes in temperature with anything else than CO2ÂÂ.
But simple fact is: ÂNo matter what rules temperature, CO2 is easily overruled by other effects, and this CO2-argument fails. So we are left with graphs showing that CO2 follows temperatures, and no arguments that CO2 could be the main driver of temperatures.
<img src=http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2009/01/lansner-image3.png?w=640>
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/01/30/co2-temperatures-and-ice-ages/
Facts are NOT your friend, futurecurrent.
Quote from jem:
the co2 dip was preceded by the dip in antartic temperatures.
look all this is in the data which has been analyzed through dozens of studies by agw nutters.
Temps lead the accumulation and then the dissipation of CO2.
That is why your your nutters tried to develop computer models showing CO2 was forcing temps in modern times.
Those models have failed.
You team is back doing research trying to come up with a new theory.
I predict it will be some sort of partial forcing or let me coin this... Symbiotic Forcing.
If they are smart there will define (Symbiotic Forcing. Trademark... JEM 2013) in a way the will prevent real research from distinguishing the work done by real drivers like sun and tides.
Quote from futurecurrents:
You really have to wonder about the cognitive abilities of the denier morons. It's such a simple cause-effect relationship. A rising greenhouse gas causes rising temps and we're seeing them. Bigtime. But they don't understand. I mean, how stupid are they?
I'm sure it must be due to political ideology. They just can't admit both that they are wrong and the "left" is right.
Quote from Fractals 'R Us:
You're kind of a name calling little Bitch aren't you?
This is fun, I get to use this obsessed asshole like a punching bag whenever I feel like my testosterone needs a little boost...
His arguments are not about reason. He uses appeals to experts, ad hominims, circular reasoning, and simple repetition designed to wear down the opposition.. he probably has it all programmed on function keys, maybe gets paid by the word by moveon.org...